Answer:
one particular cost issue that I noticed as a team manger is the inability to keep our budget in line due to additional costs that kept coming up intermittently. This cost issue almost cost us the entire project.
Explanation:
At the execution phase of the project I was managing, additional costs that needed immediate attention drove us to emergency mode at a point with a huge budget overrun that pushed us to the brink of project shutdown.
To rectify the issue, I called for a meeting with my team and the following steps were taken
- we extended the time for the completion of the project.
- Requested for the services of a professional accountant to prepare a comprehensive budget that will give cater for emergencies.
- We developed good processes and habits will help significantly reduce the likelihood that your project budget will turn into a catastrophe such as weekly reviews.
Answer:
Always higher than manufacturing cost per unit for variable costing.
Explanation:
Absorption costing continuously contains fixed overheads similarly while computing the manufacturing cost.
Conversely, under variable costing only adjustable overheads were included.
Thus, the manufacturing cost under absorption costing method is always higher than variable costing method
Therefore, per unit cost will always be higher under absorption costing than in variable costing.
So, option C is the correct option
They are allowed to do that as long as it was staff who searched it but even then it is pretty intrusive to your privacy.
hope this helps have a great day!
If in fact, the salesperson did knowingly and willingly, after being asked to sell you a "model...that is safe to charge indoors", sold you a hoverboard which
catches afire while it is being charged
inside a building of some kind, to my knowledge, this most assuredly does breach the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose, the aforementioned being upheld due to the fact that the product in question was only purchased because the buyer expressed a need for safety indoors to which, it was then "IMPLIED" by the aforementioned salesperson that this peice of merchandise was that which the customer was seeking. "Judgement for the plaintiff in the form of punitive damages and restitution in the amount of such and such, and so on and so forth, etc., etc..." Case Closed!!!
