Srivijaya was a Kingdom located in Sumatra, Indonesia, and it controlled the Malay Archipelago. Since it was made up of islands, its geography helped to develop maritime technology and with this, the trade with its neighbor nations improved. They trade mostly with India and China, so the Srivijaya culture began to incorporate religious traditions such as Buddhism, which became an important part of their culture, gaining a prominent role in the Buddhist world.
Answer:
In order for "buying on the margin" to work in the long run, stock values have to rise.
Explanation:
For stock buying to work in the long run, stock values must rise. This is because it will be necessary to buy them within the concept of speculation, where the buyer and the investor have the hope that this action will generate profits. However, the risk of this type of investment is very high and, therefore, if the shares assume low values, they will not compensate for the purchase in relation to the venture's risk.
Based on this excerpt, we can infer that the point that Ida B. Wells is trying to make is that<u> D. </u><u>White men </u><u>rarely </u><u>embrace progressive </u><u>ideas without a </u><u>financial motive.</u>
Ida Bell Wells was:
- A journalist who reported on the racist actions of white people in the United States, especially in the South
- A Civil rights leader
- A key individual in the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP).
In this excerpt, Ida Bells is saying that in order to get a White man to listen to anything, one would need to convince them that there is a financial gain to be made.
In reference to the Progressive Era therefore, we can infer that Wells was of the opinion that White men would only support progressive ideals if they stood to make something from it.
In conclusion, Ida Wells was saying that white men rarely embrace progressive ideals unless they stand to gain financially.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/23500689. </em>
Answer:
Document analysis is the first step in working with primary sources
Explanation:
National Archives Museum. Declaration of Independence. Constitution of the United States. Bill of Rights.The oldest written record identified so far is a set of fragments from a manuscript Talmud dating from about 1100. The fragments were sent to the State Department in 1933 as evidence to support a claim against Turkey brought by Ephraim Deinard, an antiquities collector. The National Archives building holds the original copies of the three main formative documents of the United States and its government: the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights.For the arts, history, and humanities, original primary source documents usually are housed in museums, archives, restricted library collections, and government offices. Reproductions of primary source documents often can be found in online digital collections, microform collections, books, and other secondary works. Hope this helps!!!
<span>Considering the variety of movements covered in the section of your text entitled "The Rise in Cultural Nationalism how did American cultural life in the early nineteenth century reflect the Republican vision of the nation's future?
Jefferson and the Republicans championed the rights of the states and advocated a strict adherence to the Constitution, but once in office, they found new situations that demanded governmental actions that, in some cases, went beyond what the Federalists had done. What caused Jefferson and his party to change their approach to governing, what reservations did they have about what they were doing, and how were they able to rationalize this apparent change in program and philosophy? (Be sure to consult previous chapters when answering this question.)
How did the Federalists respond to Republican programs? If the Federalists favored a loose interpretation of the Constitution, why did they protest when Jefferson used a loose interpretation as well? What was it in the Republican program that the Federalists saw as a threat, and how did they respond?
Many historians view the War of 1812 as the second American war for independence but is this an accurate characterization? In what way did British policies prior to 1812 threaten our independence? Had the United States not fought the war, what might the results have been? Assess these questions, and determine if the United States was indeed fighting for independence."</span>