Answer:
4.77 × 10^-4
Explanation:
Given that
Population of the city of Atlantis on March 30, 2003 = 193,000
No. of new active cases of TB occurring between January 1 and June 30, 2003 = 92
No. of active TB cases according to the city register on June 30, 2003 = 338
So, the incident rate of active cases is shown below:
= (No. of new active cases of TB occurring between January 1 and June 30, 2003) ÷ (Population of the city of Atlantis on March 30, 2003 - No. of active TB cases according to the city register on June 30, 2003)
= (92) ÷ (193,000 - 338)
= (92) ÷ (192,662)
= 4.77 × 10^-4
Answer:
Implicit Costs = $35,000
correct option is b. $35,000
Explanation:
given data
total revenue = $100,000
rent = $3,000
overhead averages = $500 per month
Ramona earn = $35,000 per year
to find out
total implicit costs
solution
we know that here Total Rent paid is
Total Rent paid = 3000 × 12
Total Rent paid = $36000
and
Total employee payment = 2000 × 12
Total employee payment = $24000
and
Total ingredient and overhead = 500× 12
Total ingredient and overhead = $6000
and
Explicit Costs = 36000 + 24000 + 6000 = $66000
so here
Implicit Costs = The opportunity cost of not working as a manager
Implicit Costs = $35,000
correct option is b. $35,000
Answer:
A central feature of monetary policy strategies in all countries is the use of a nominal variable that monetary policymakers use as an intermediate target to achieve an ultimate goal such as price stability. Such a variable is called a nominal
Explanation:
PA BRAINLIEST
Answer:
Probably not, because Alyssa made a mistake about the dog's value, not a mistake about material fact.
Explanation:
When Sierra offered to sell the dog to Allysa, Allysa failed to discuss the ancestry of the puppy. She wrongly believed the dog came from a line of champions.
On finding out the dog is only worth $200, she will not be able to rescind the contract because the onus to ask all relevant questions about the purchase before accepting is on her.
She made the mistake of assuming the dog was worth $800. She made a mistake about the dog's value and not the material fact.