Answer:
Hi, can you explain what the question is referring to?
Explanation:
If you're confused about what a positive social change is, it could be anything like the black lives matter movement or the body positivity trend promoted through social media. A social change is basically a conversion from an older social norm, and the question is asking what the relationship is between social media and positive social change. Hope this helps!
Answer:
To Motivate the Distraught Patriots to Fight for American Victory
Explanation:
Thomas Paine wrote The American Crisis which was published from 1776 to 1783. This was the time of American Revolution. The year 1776 in American history was crucial since the entire cause of the American rebels was on the verge of collapse. The revolution was going through uncertain times. At such tough time Paine aimed, through his pamphlet, at breathing strong motivation into the distraught patriots so that they could fight to ensure victory for American.
When Odysseus goes to inspect the cave that he later learns belongs to the Cyclops, Polyphemus, he brings with him a goat skin bottle of dark wine that was given to him by Maron.
Odysseus does not agree with the men stealing food from the cyclops Polyphemus's cave not because he believes it is a moral wrong, but because he believes that if the men meet Polyphemus and request shelter, the cyclops will offer shelter and a valuable gift, as is the social and religious expectation in Odysseus's world.
In the end Odysseus’s men were correct and Odysseus’s plan goes completely awry when Polyphemus appears and attacks and eats some of Odysseus's men. Polyphemus does not observe the social norm of hospitality, as he does not believe himself to be subservient to the gods, such as Zeus, who favor humans who observe hospitality. However Odysseus manages to blind Polyphemus and escapes the island with the remainder of his men. Odysseus let his overconfidence overshadow the cautious suggestion of the men to sneak off with the food from Polyphemus's cave.
The protest document is urging readers to assert their opposition to the draft.
It views conscription (forced enrollment in the military) as a transgression of the citizens' rights protected by the Constitution. That is why the document asks people to resist the draft ("Do not submit to intimidation") because if they consent, they are also part of the problem. Submitting and being silent about their rights would mean that they are encouraging freedom violation: "If you do not assert and support your rights, you are helping to deny or disparage rights."
