<span>The question is incomplete, here is the complete question which I previously came across;</span>
When Janice went to work as a hair stylist in Rick's beauty shop, she entered into an agreement with Rick, whereby, if she left she would not work for another beauty shop within 50 miles for 2 years. Rick trained Janice in a number of new techniques. After nine months, Janice was offered a great job down the street at a new beauty shop, quit Rick, and had a number of customers follow her down the street to her new job. Rick claimed that she had signed a contract and had no right to go to work at the new shop. Janice disagreed and told Rick that no judge in the country would enforce such an agreement. Janice told Rick that she was more worried about a customer, Treena, who was threatening to sue her because her hair turned green after Janice worked on it. Janice agreed that Treena's hair was damaged. Janice pointed out, however, that she told Treena that odd results could result from a dye attempt, and she required that Treena sign a contract releasing Janice from all liabilities before she did anything with Treena's hair. Treena, however, sued anyway. The agreement Rick and Janice entered into is referred to as?
The answer is, the agreement Rick and Janice entered into is referred to as "<span>covenant not to compete".</span>
<span>
</span>
It is hard
to decide if a judge will implement a non-competition agreement. While the privileged insights of a business are important,
the law additionally puts value to a person's opportunity to seek after other
work. To be enforceable Courts more often than not require that a contract not
to compete be sensible. In California, non-competes are adequately unlawful
except if you are selling a business. Different states will implement a few provisions,
as a rule the trade secret protection, however not the work limitations.
Answer:
The correct answer here is option D.
Explanation:
Investment banks are special kind of financial institutions or intermediaries who are concerned with raising capital for other companies.
They also perform advisory based transaction services on the behalf of corporations, individuals and government.
In performing these functions, they often are found guilty of pressurizing analysts to produce favorable research for their clients, attempts to alter research of client's firm and permitting executives of client's firm to do so. They also get involved in prohibiting analysts from making any negative or controversial comments about client they are serving.
They do all these to maintain credit worthiness of their client firm, so that the client is able to procure capital.
Answer:
$63.27
Explanation:
Calculation of how much should you pay on the stock today
First step
The Price of stock 19 years from now will be:.
20/0.075
= 266.67
Second step
The Price of stock today will be :
The price of stock from 19 years from now which is:
250 / (1.075)^19
=250/3.951489
=$63.27
Therefore how much should you pay on the stock today will be $63.27
Answer:
RE decrease: 1,960,000
Explanation:
Retained earnings will decrease for the total amount of the dividends.
<u>stocks dividends</u>
560,000 shares
10% stock dividends: 560,000 x 10% = 56,000 shares
56,000 x $30 = 1,680,000 stock dividends
<u>cash dividends:</u>
560,000 x 0.50 per share = 280,000 cash dividends
Total dividends: 1,680,000 + 280,000 = 1,960,000
that will be the RE decrease
Answer:
1. $34 million
2. $0
Explanation:
Given that,
Fair value of Centerpoint Inc = $256 million
Book value of Centerpoint's net assets (excluding goodwill) = $228 million
Book value of Centerpoint's net assets (including goodwill) = 290 million
1. Actual Value of Goodwill:
= Fair Value of Centrepoint Inc. - Book Value of Net assets (excluding goodwill)
= $256 million - 228 million
= $28 million
Loss on Impairment of Goodwill:
= Goodwill recorded - Actual value of goodwill
= $62 million - $28 million
= $34 million
2. In this case Fair value of ($318 million) is more than Book value ($290 million) then there will be no Impairment Loss.
It means that the loss on Impairment of Goodwill = $0.