The answer to this question is true.
Answer:
By giving more power to the states rather than the central government.
Explanation:
The Articles of Confederations were made when the founding fathers still have little experience in politics.
At first, they made the state to have more power than the central government to prevent the new nation from turning into a tyrannical monarchy like the British empire.
But when they're implementing it, they soon realized that lack of strength in central government only making it impossible for them to control the states that wanted to create disruption to another states. This was the reason why they proposed several ratifications to the articles.
The problem with giving plastic power in the hands of a representative body is that through it you can give basically a wide range of possible abilities/power which they can exert as they please. This isn't the best idea to do when the current representative body is prone to corruption for example.
<span>An example of an act of civil disobedience is protesting and burning the draft card. It goes against the institution. Civil disobedience is the dynamic, maintained refusal to comply with specific laws, requests, and orders of a legislature, or of an involving global power. Civil disobedience is a typical or formal infringement of the law, as opposed to a dismissal of the framework all in all.</span>
The major difference between Bach’s cello suite no. 6 from 1–5 is that cello suite no. 6 is the " only cello that is notated in the alto and soprano clefs or tenor and treble clefs in recent editions."
Cello suite no. 6 differs from other cello suites 1-5 because it is written in a free technique than other suites 1-5.
It also has additional improvised directions and virtuosic passages.
Cello suite no. 6 is generally considered to be a symphony for solo cello.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that there are many differences between Bach’s Cello suite no. 6 and Cello suite no. 1–5.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/9931309
