I'm guessing it is B because it doesn't have enough information. My reasoning is because: Just because you are buying a house doesn't mean you have kids or will have kids, and if you don't elementary school wouldn't be a factor you will consider
hope this helps
Answer: $460 billion, but the effect would be larger if there were an investment accelerator.
Explanation:
If the MPC = 0.75 and there is no investment accelerator or crowding out, then a $115 billion increase in the government expenditures would result in the shift in the aggregate demand curve right by:
= $115 billion ÷ (1 - 0.75)
= $115 billion ÷ 0.25
= $115 billion × 1/0.25
= $115 billion / 0.25
= $460 billion.
Therefore, there'll be a shift in the aggregate demand curve right by $460 billion, but the effect would be larger if there were an investment accelerator
Answer:
The statement is: True.
Explanation:
A common-cause variation shows changes because of unknown reasons within a series of undifferentiated produced items. The method aims to measure the accuracy of the manufacturing process given expected factors that could bring fluctuations in the output. Common-cause variations can be attributed to natural reasons such as employees' fatigue or distraction.
Answer:
C) A 25% increase in sales resulting in a 30% increase in net operating income.
