The international Fisher effect is the difference in nominal interest rates across countries reflecting the difference in expected rates of inflation in those countries.
<h3>What does the Fisher effect show?</h3>
It shows that the nominal rate of interest in a nation usually follows the inflation rate because an inflation-adjusted rate needs to be formed.
This then leads to a change in exchange rates between countries because the difference in nominal rates shows the difference in inflation which is what devalues or appreciates a currency.
Find out more on the fisher effect at brainly.com/question/16036767.
#SPJ1
Answer:
Jones is liable to pay.
He is liable to pay to the tune of $1000. This may be negotiated however if it is not fair.
Explanation:
See the following points
- The question above is an example of Implied At-law contracts. (We will get to the definition of this in a bit).
- A contract is a legally binding agreement that recognises and governs the rights and duties of the parties to the agreement. A contract is legally enforceable because it meets the requirements and approval of<u> the Law</u>. From the above definition it is clear that two people may actually be engaging in a contract without knowing it.
- The law defines that a contract is.
- Contracts may be Express or Implied.
- Express contracts are simply contracts that are stated expressly, or openly, in either writing or orally, at the time of contract formation.
- Implied contracts are created when two or more parties have no written contract.
- There are two types of implied contracts:
- Implied In-Fact Contracts: these are contracts which create an obligation between the parties based on the facts of the situation. For example, assume your neighbor hires you to wash his car every Friday for the entire holidays. You wash your neighbor’s car for the first four weekends of the holidays and get paid on Friday morning each time. The fifth Friday you wash the car and when you arrive at your neighbor’s house for your pay, your neighbor refuses to pay you. The law will infer that there is a contract between you and your neighbor, even though you never put anything in writing. This is an implied in-fact contract.
2. The other type of Implied contract is that which is Implied At-Law
In the case between Jones and Smith, the law imposes a duty to perform a contract, and will enforce such a contract even against a person’s will, where the situation is such that without this legal intervention, one party would be <u>unfairly enriched</u> or advantaged by another party’s action.
- In the question above, Smith is a CPA. He is qualified in every respect to carry out Professional Tax services. His services may be relied upon with a great degree of confidence.
- If Jones had not filed those tax returns, he probably would have lost monies that should have accrued to him from the government.
This type of agreement is also considered a quasi-contract. A quasi-contract occurs where the law imposes an obligation upon the parties where in fact the parties did not intend to enter into a contract and made no promise to perform.
However, because one party would be unjustly enriched by another party’s action, the beneficiary of those actions must make restitution or pay fair value for the services provided, even though there was never any intention to enter into an agreement.
Cheers!
Answer:
Explanation:
Given:
Current value, C = $60000
Assessed value, A = 30 percent of its current value
= 30% × C
Equalisation factor, E = 1.25
The tax rate is $4 per $100 of assessed valuation.
Assessed value, A = 30/100 × 60000
= $18000
Total assessed valuation = assessed value × E
= $18000 × 1.25
= $22500
Tax rate of $4/$100 × assessed valuation
Tax amount = tax rate × assessed valuation
= ($4 × $22500)/$100
= $900
With stocks of 8% for A and 16% for B, The global minimum variance is given as 10.5 percent
<h3>How to solve for the variance</h3>
The expected return of the stock for the country a is given as 0.05
The Weight of this country's stock market WA = 0.5
The expected return of the stock for the country a is given as 0.16
The Weight of this country's stock market Wb = 0.5
Expected Return of the portfolio can be calculated as
= (WA x RA) + (WB * RB)
Expected Return of the portfolio = (0.5x 0.05 ) +(0.5*0.16)
= 0.105
= 10.5%
Read more on variance here: brainly.com/question/10687815
You have to pay back interest, and the later you pay, the more you owe!<span />
