Answer:
The answer is in a perfect competition profit is maximized when marginal cost equal marginal revenue and price is equal to average revenue and marginal revenue, while in monopolist profit is maximized when marginal cost is equal to marginal revenue.
Explanation:
The firm in a perfectly competitive market is a price taker,the price in the market is determined by the market forces of demand and supply. The firm has to sell their product at the ruling market price.The demand curve facing the firm in perfectly competitive market is horizontal or perfectly elastic, profit is therefore maximized when the marginal cost is equal to average revenue and marginal revenue. The firm in the market operate at the output level in which the price and marginal revenue is equal to marginal cost. Whatever prices that change the market demand or supply will change the demand curve faced by the firm.The firm cannot do anything to this than to accept the market price and the demand curve.
In a monopoly the demand curve is identical to the demand curve of the firm, because industry demand curve is downward sloping.The monopolist can either set the price or quantity not the two.when one is determined the value of the other will be determined by the demand function. The profit maximization of the monopolist also requires that marginal cost must be equal to marginal revenue just like in the case of perfect completion.when the monopolist equates MR and MC the monopolist determines its output and the market price for the product. The revenue curve is steeper than the demand curve,because the straight line is the market demand. The firm will have to reduce The price of the product if they want to sell more of their product the unit of the product sold is the AR which is equal to the price.Therefore the AR curve of the monopolist and the perfect competition MR and AR are both identical that informed the reason why the marginal revenue curve is steeper than the demand curve for a single price monopolist.
Price Elasticity of Supply. The price elasticity of supply is calculated as the percentage change in quantity divided by the percentage change in price.
Using the Midpoint Method
PES = ((Q2-Q1) / ((Q2 + Q1) / 2)) / ((P2-P1) / ((P2 + P1) / 2))
PES = (((10) - (7)) / (((10) + (7)) / 2)) / (((50) - (40)) / (((50) + (40)) / 2))
PES = 1.59
the elasticity of beth's labor supply between the wages of $ 40 and $ 50 per hour is approximately 1.59
In this case, to 1% rise in price causes an increase in quantity supplied of 1.59%
answer:
the elasticity of beth's labor supply between the wages of $ 40 and $ 50 per hour is approximately 1.59
In this case, to 1% rise in price causes an increase in quantity supplied of 1.59%
Answer:
$500
Explanation:
Damages refer to the financial loss suffered by a party to a breached contract. It occurs as a result of one party refusing to perform their obligation in the contract, causing injury and losses to the other.
Damages are the extra expense incurred by the offended party due to the breach of contract. The calculation of damages involves getting the difference between the market price and the contract price. For Diana, the damages will be the market price of $4.50, and the contact price $3.50. Because the books were 500, her damage would be 500 X 1 = $500.
Answer:
Explanation:
Given that:
weekly demand = 72 units
no of weeks in 1 year = 48
Then; total demand = 72 × 48 = 3456 units
No of orders = 
= 
∴
The periodic review (P) = 
= 
= 0.041956 year
≅ 2 weeks
Z score based on 88 percent service level = NORMSINV(0.88) = 1.18
Here;
Lead time = 3 wks
P = 2 weeks
Thus protection interval = ( 3+2) weeks
= 5 weeks
Safety stock = z-score × std dev. of demand at (P+L) days
std dev = 
= 2.236 × 18
std dev = 40.248 units
Safety stock = 1.18 × 40.248
safety stock = 47.49 units
Safety stock ≅ 48 units
Average demand during(P + L) = 5 × 72 units
= 360 units
Target inventory level = average demand + safety stock
= 360 units + 48 units
= 408 units
Answer:
Abdul's surplus= $400
Total surplus=$500
Explanation:
Consumer surplus can be defined as the amount a consumer is willing to pay and the amount he actually paid (which is usually less).
Given:
Carolina willing selling price=$2,000
Abdul willing buying price=$2,500
Abdul negotiated price=$2,100
Abdul is willing to pay $2,500 but he negotiated $2,100
Abdul's surplus= $2,500-$2,100
=$400
Total surplus= Abdul's willing price - carolilina's willing price
Total surplus= $2,500 - $2,000
= $500
