All categories

3 years ago

Solve equation k/0.32=2.2

1 answer:

3 0

Hey there Shynee!
To do this equation, you have to flip the equation and do it on both sides.
k/0.32 = 2.2
Instead of division, multiply on both sides.
k/0.32 * 0.32 = 2.2 * 0.32
This isolates the variable
k = 0.704
and finds what x equals.

Check:
0.704/0.32 = 2.2
Correct.

I hope I helped!
~Olivia

You might be interested in

A study was conducted to determine whether magnets were effective in treating pain. The values represent measurements of pain us

amm1812

Answer:

Given:

Sham: n= 20, x=0.44, s=1.24,

Magnet:n= 20, x =0.49, s= 0.95

For Sham:

Sample size, n = 20

Sample mean = 0.44

Standard deviation = 1.24

For Magnet:

Sample size = 20

Sample mean = 0.49

Standard deviation = 0.95

The null and alternative hypotheses:

H0: s1²=s2²

H1: s1² ≠ s2²

a) To find the test statistics, use the formula:

$\frac{s1^2}{s2^2}$

$\frac{1.24^2}{0.95^2} = \frac{1.5376}{0.9025} = 1.7037$

Test statistics = 1.7037

b) P-value:

Sham: degrees of freedom $= n - 1 = 20 - 1 = 19$

Magnet: degrees of freedom $= n - 1 = 20 - 1 = 19$

The critical values:

[Za/2, df1, df2)], [(1 - Za/2), df1, df2]

$f[0.05/2, 19, 19], f[(1 - 0.05/2), 19, 19]$

$f[0.025, 19, 19], f[0.975, 19, 19]$

$(2.526, 0.3958)$

The rejection region:

Reject H0, if F < 0.3958 or if F > 2.526

c) Conclusion:

Since the critical values of test statistic is between (0.3958 < 1.7037 < 2.526), we fail to reject null hypothesis H0.

There is insufficient evidence to to support the claim that those given a sham treatment have reductions that vary more than those treated with magnets

3 0

3 years ago

What’s 7,040 divide by 3 using long division

gizmo_the_mogwai [7]

Answer:

Dividing 7,040 by 3 using long division method it gives the quotient <u>2346</u> and the remainder <u>2</u>.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

7,040 divide by 3 using long division.

Now, to divide using long division method:

Step 1: Divide 7 by 3. 3 x 2 =6.

So, 1 will be remainder.

Step 2: Bring 0 down next to 1. So, now the new number is 10 .

Divide 10 by 3. 3 x 3 = 9.

Remainder is 1

So, quotient is 23 till now.

Step 3: Bring 4 down next to 1. The number is now 14.

Divide 14 by 3. 3 x 4 = 12.

Thus, remainder is 2.

Step 4: Bring 0 next to 2. Getting the new number 20.

So, divide 20 by 3. 3 x 6 = 18.

Thus, the remainder is 2.

So, the quotient is 2346.

And the remainder is 2.

Therefore, dividing 7,040 by 3 using long division method it gives the quotient 2346 and the remainder 2.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

If you know the answer to these plz answer.

kondaur [170]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

You can readily see from the diagram, above, that the side length of the middle cube will be between 3 and 4. You want to determine to the nearest hundredth what value between 3 and 4 represents the side length of the cube whose volume is 45 units^3.

Please note: the middle cube has been mislabeled. Instead of volume = 30 units^3, the volume should be 45 units^3.

Here's the procedure:

Guess an appropriate s value. Let's try s = side length = 3.5

Cube this: (3.5 units)^3 = 42.875. Too small. Choose a larger possible side length, such as 3.7: 3.7^3 = 50.653. Too large.

Try s = 3.6: 3.6^3 = 46.66. Too large.

Choose a smaller s, one between 3.5 and 3.6: 3.55^3 = 44.73. This is the best estimate yet for s. Continue this work just a little further. Try s = 3.57. Cube it. How close is the result to 45 cubic units?

7 0

3 years ago

Which compound inequality could be represented by the graph? -5 4 -3 -1 0 4 0 X5 3 or x>-1

AveGali [126]

_44_3_10 4 0 ×53 ×<9 =02947</245

8 0

3 years ago

5.b) If z^(1/2)=x^(1/2)+y^(1/2) , show that (x+y-z)^2=4xy

Rudik [331]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

(x+y-z)²= 4xy
(x+y-z)²- 4xy = 0
(x+y-z)²-(2√x√y)² = 0
(x+y-z-2√x√y)(x+y-z+2√x√y) =0
[(√x-√y)²-z]*[(√x+√y)²-z]=0
(√x-√y)²-z = 0 or (√x+√y)²-z = 0

We have : z^(1/2)= x^(1/2)+y^(1/2) ⇒ √z = √x + √y ⇒ z = (√x + √y)²

so (√x+√y)²-z = 0

so (x+y-z)²= 4xy

3 0

3 years ago