1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ExtremeBDS [4]
4 years ago
5

Wich does anarchy mean

History
1 answer:
Maslowich4 years ago
5 0

Answer:

rule by few individuals

Explanation:

anarchy is the absence of government and absolute freedom of the individual ,regarded as a political idaal

You might be interested in
Please hurry and help<br><br> Define federalism in your own words
Sidana [21]

Answer:

Federalism is a system of government in which entities such as states or provinces share power with a national government. The United States government functions according to the principles of federalism. ... The national government oversees the election results, but each state controls its own voting procedures.

Explanation:

BRAINLIEST ME TY

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did Hammurabi have his laws engraved in stone and placed in a public place?
VMariaS [17]
The main reason why Hammurabi had his laws engraved in stone and placed in a public place is because he wanted them to be well known by all of his citizens so that they could be followed. Transparency is key in any legal system. <span />
4 0
3 years ago
Which of these added to the panic of 1819?
Paraphin [41]

Answer:

The answer is D

Explanation:

Hope this helps:)....if not then sorry for wasting your time and may God bless you:)

3 0
2 years ago
In the end, Roosevelt agreed to Randolph’s request and issued Executive Order 8802, which forbade discrimination in defense indu
madam [21]

Answer:

Roosevelt feared any disruption in the nations efforts to prepare for war

Explanation:

On Edge

3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the case of Chiafalo v. Washington (2020), the Supreme Court ruled that it is constitutional for states to place restrictions
Sergio039 [100]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

In the case of Chiafalo v. Washington (2020), the Supreme Court ruled that it is constitutional for states to place restrictions on who electors can vote for.

I agree with this decision because voting in the Electoral College is a serious thing, and members of the college have to assume this important and serious role. That is why they are members of the Electoral College and expressed their intention to vote for the candidate they supported.

I think there would be no room for faithless electors in the US Electoral College. There is no reason for them to vote for other people if they originally pledge to vote for their candidates.

On July 6, 2020, the case of Chiafalo v. Washington was decided.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 50 POINTS!!!!
    15·1 answer
  • 16d identify the new deal policies proposed by president roosevelt to resolve the economic effects of the great depression.
    13·1 answer
  • Place the following events in chronological order. Tiles the Sepoy Rebellion formation of the British East India Company complet
    13·1 answer
  • decide whether each statement is true of the indian national congress, the all muslim league, or both
    14·1 answer
  • How did the open door policy help prevent any one nation from monopolizing trade with China
    8·2 answers
  • An effect of transportation improvements on settlements was that:
    15·1 answer
  • How did Islam most immediately impact women in Arabia? NEED HELP NOW WILL MARK BRAINLYeST
    12·2 answers
  • Why was the trip of Magellan difficult?
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following kings was
    7·1 answer
  • Give two reasons why you believe a colonist would want to move to this city.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!