New evidence is discovered & Oversights and errors are corrected
Thats what i personally think because new opinions have to be backed with evidence, while if a piece of evidence is lost or stolen, it doesn't change the arguments because even though it is lost or stolen, there ought to be copies of the original object, but im not sure about new technology being applied to evidence, but it can go either or, its a 50/50 because new technology can enhance historical discoveries, or find new ones, but applying new technology as evidence has to be backed up with facts as to why it should be applied
Because the french and the british were fighting over land from the Native Americans so they wernt very happy about that!
Advantages of Westward Expansion include the gold rush, mining opportunities, the cattle industry, being a cowboy, traveling by railroad, more availability of supplies, and being able to own land cheaply and effectively.
Answer and Explanation:
Archaeologists and historians believed that human beings ceased to be nomads and began to settle in permanent homes after the agricultural revolution. This made human beings realize that it would be better to live in one place and plant their own food, than to hunt. This proved to be very useful for the civilization that was beginning to establish itself, however, in order to practice productive agriculture it was important to establish the division of labor, where each member of the community would be responsible for a certain function that would work in harmony with the other members.
This division of labor promoted rapid agricultural production, allowing the food produced to feed the community and be left over, promoting a surplus of food. This generated the first steps of the trade and a somewhat rudimentary economy, but very efficient to follow the human evolution over the years.
