All categories

3 years ago

In United States v. Butler, the Supreme Court overturned the Agricultural Adjustment Administration (AAA) because

Business

1 answer:

joja [24]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

The correct answer is the tax on food processors was unconstitutional.

Explanation:

On January 6, 1936, the Supreme Court decided in the United States v. Butler, that the act was unconstitutional for the collection of this tax on processors only so that it will be returned to the farmers. The regulation of agriculture was considered a state power. As such, the federal government could not force states to adopt the Agricultural Adjustment Act due to lack of jurisdiction. However, the Agrarian Law of 1938 remedied these technical problems and the agricultural program continued.

You might be interested in

What is it called when the government uses some tool other than money to allocate goods?

erastovalidia [21]

A
Its rationing easily

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which is the new crime created by Sarbanes-Oxley? a. mail fraud b. obstruction of justice c. certification of false financial st

meriva

Answer:

The correct answer is letter "C": certification of false financial statements.

Explanation:

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) is a statute that aims to increase corporate governance and enhance internal control of companies. SOX's primary purpose is to protect stakeholders from false corporate financial statement representations. Investors must know that the financial information on which they rely is accurate and that their accuracy has been checked by an independent third party.

Altering, destroying, covering-up or falsifying information in the financial statements of a firm is considered a crime since the SOX implementation with a maximum sentence of 20 years.

3 0

3 years ago

Kite Sales. Wendy is president of a business that manufactures kites. The kites of her company, ABC Kites, are sold to large toy

LuckyWell [14K]

Answer:

She violated the duty of loyalty

Explanation:

One of the fiduciary duties of a director is to always act in the best interest of the company .

Similar to this is the duty of loyalty that prevents the director from acting against the interest of the company and also guide the director against activities that could bring conflict of interest whereby he is involved in reaping personal benefits from the position she occupies .

This describes Wendy's action of personal dealing based on her position as the president of Kite sale

5 0

3 years ago

On January 1, 2018, Baddour, Inc., issued 10% bonds with a face amount of $168 million. The bonds were priced at $147.2 million

bagirrra123 [75]

Answer:

(A)Balance sheet

Bonds at September 30th

Bonds Payable 168,000,000

Discount on Bonds (20,152,000)

Interest Payable 12,600,000

Net 160,448,000

(B) Income Statment

Interest Expense 13,248,000

(C)Cash Flow Statment

Financing

Cash generate for Bonds issued 147,200,000

Explanation:

Jan 1st, 2018 168,000,000 face value

Issed at 147.2M for an effective rate of 12%

Discount of 20.8M

Bonds at September 30th

accrued interest expense: 147,200,000 x 12% x 9/12 = 13,248,000

interest payable: 168,000,000 x 10% x 9/12 = 12,600,000

amortization of Discount: 648,000

7 0

3 years ago

As his company globalizes its business, Jordan faces cultural challenges related to differing ethical standards. To make ethical

tatyana61 [14]

Answer:

embrace transparency and conduct all negotiations as openly as possible.

Explanation:

Jordan's company is expanding to become a global company, so he needs to consider different cultures and government regulations.

To succeed he will need to be open about processes in the organisation as there will be different interpretations from different culture types when communication is not clear.

Also he needs to be transparent to build trust in his globally distributed team.

5 0

3 years ago