In this scenario with the boat the person that would prevail is the man that bought the boat.
<h3>The reason why the man would prevail</h3>
This is due to the fact that the people that sold him the boat should have made sure that they were not selling a defective item.
The accident was not the fault of the man. The defect should have been well detected and dealt with before the sale of the boat.
Read more on defects here:
brainly.com/question/14857303
#SPJ12
Let's analyze in the case of manufacturer's emission that cause polution
Usually, these pollution-producing companies are regulated to pay several amount of money in order to rehabilitate the environment that caused by their harmful material.
This is really inefficient , if they have to repair it, why allow them to destroy the environment in the first place ?
That's how emission standards could reduce the inefficiency
Yes this statement is true.
Explanation:
The sale of banana will add the twice contribution in the GDP as because the price is double and the sell of every single unit in the market in comparison of apple is able to add more currency in the economy than a sell of every single unit of apple.
The higher price may affect the sale as people will move to the other alternative but how much sell of banana will take place will able to add more money in the market as compared to apple.
Answer:
Check the explanation
Explanation:
The subscription price of tights offering is lower than the market price of share. It represents that rights offered by the company are more valuable to the investors, using which they can purchase the new shares of the company.
If they are not interested in participating in the rights offering, they can sell their rights at the fair market value.
check the below image to see the following steps in calculating the money that will be received by selling the rights.