I think d is the answer
Explanation:
all stakeholders must not be independent all must work together
Answer:
PMT = $95,000
Rate = 4%
Life = 8 years
a. Amount to be deposited today
= PV(Rate, N, -PMT)
= PV(4%, 8, -95,000)
= $639,610.76
b. Amount in account after 3rd withdrawal
= PV(Rate, N, -PMT)
= PV(4%, 5, -95,000)
= $422,913.12
c. Balance in account after 8th withdrawal
= = PV(Rate, N, -PMT)
= PV(4%, 0, -95,000)
= $0
d. How much would you have at the end of 8 years?
= FV(4%, 8, -639610.76)
= $875,351.49
Answer:
Word of Mouth.
Explanation:
As Magnira Inc. is trying to promote its cosmetics. It offers discounts to customers who post about its products' benefits in their social media accounts. This enables others to know about the company's products. In this case, customers of Magnira Inc. are involved in word of mouth. Word of mouth is considered as more authentic, valid and reliable source of information for the customers. Customers truly believe that its more genuine kind of information which is coming from the customers not the company itself, therefore, customer pay more attention to it and give more weightage to it. Customers do not believe much on the advertisement because they know that ads are being aired by the company itself and it is the paid from but word of mouth are the true and genuine comments and feedback of the customers who have used the brand by themselves.
The retailer was asking the designers to agree to <u>Exclusive distribution</u>.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Exclusive distribution is characterized as the arrangement under which a participant is a supplier and provider. It specifies that the seller can not offer their service or item to some other group. It attaches the contract that the commodity must be distributed to an exclusive seller. The retailer asks developers for exclusive supply as per the situation specified in the discussion. Retailer does not want the jewelry design to be sold to any other outlet or retailer for successful sale. Thus agreement on this matter is suggested by the retailer.
Answer:
Multiplier effect in the 4th round = 3.58
Explanation:
A change in aggregate demand can create a much greater impact in the equilibrium national income. This is known as the multiplier effect. This occurs when injections of new demand for goods and services into the circular flow of income creates further rounds of spending. For example, if the government spending was on building new affordable houses then the need for housing materials will create demand for wood, cement and other housing supplies. Thus, these businesses will see a rise in sales. Whilst they benefit through profits, their employees would benefit from wages and salaries. As their income rises, they will spend it in the economy, and so will the businesses from their profits. This additional rounds of spending is the multiplier effect.
If a 100 increase creates 33 for the second round, it is 33% (33/100 x 100) i.e. 100 x 33% = 33
This is proven since 33 x 33% = 10.89 in the third round.
Hence, the multiplier effect in the forth round = 10.89 x 33% = 3.58
