1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tcecarenko [31]
2 years ago
12

What does the story of Celia tell us about the changing social norm ? (Celia Slave Story)

History
1 answer:
Ghella [55]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

That gradually, but very slowly, white people had to morally come clear with slavery and abuse of female slaves.

Explanation:

Celia is the haunting story of a young black girl (14 years old!) who is abused by her white owner in Missouri . During 5 long years she put up with it but then decided to murder him. In the trial she was vigorously defended by state-appointed attorneys, who built their case on a state law allowing women the use of deadly force in such cases.

Of course it didn't help her, she was hanged because the white social order was not to be altered legally. But it did made many white people conscious about their inmoral decisions in respect to slaves. So it did set a moral precedent.  

You might be interested in
What strategies did both césar chávez and the ufwoc use to achieve their goals? how did they successfully apply these tactics?
docker41 [41]
Cesar Chavez and the United Farmer Workers used different forms of nonviolent protest in order to achieve their goals. For example, in 1965 workers who worked on grapes farm went on strike due to their poor pay and working conditions. This was known as the Delano grape strike. Along with strike, individuals also boycotted (aka refused to buy) the products. The goal in doing this would be to hurt the amount of profit individuals made of grapes. These tactics were used for 5 years, and resulted in a positive effect for the UFWOC, as they were able to gain their first written contract with the growers.
6 0
3 years ago
Discuss the 2 pros and 2 cons of fighting total war against an enemy.
Citrus2011 [14]

Answer:

Faster end to the war ore land involved so the opportunity to win more Cons: incredibal loss of life on both sides expensive to repair all that damagge and levaves you weak

Explanation:hope this helps god bless

7 0
2 years ago
Based on the foundations of federalism, why might health care continue to be a deeply debated issue?
likoan [24]

a. tHE DEBATE IS OVER WHETHER THE ISSUE SHOULD BE UNDER FEDERAL OR STATE CONTROL

Hope this helped you out hon :)

5 0
2 years ago
For which two reasons did the Iroquois Confederacy eventually side with the British? 
mixas84 [53]
B the British promise them land
8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following US states was part of Russia before being sold to the US
Anni [7]

Answer:

Alaska

Explanation:

Was the state that was sold to the US

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which group was formed after the passage of the Coercive (Intolerable) Acts?
    13·2 answers
  • How did athens and spartans win the persian war?
    12·1 answer
  • What is the significance of Fort Sumter?
    14·1 answer
  • Tomorrow is my best friend birthday and i need help what to write for her i got her a card and i want to tell her something but
    10·2 answers
  • Which statements accurately describe the Persian Wars?
    13·2 answers
  • 7. Why did the Native Americans side with the French?
    14·1 answer
  • Native Americans first arrived in North America by Question 13 options: crossing the Atlantic in canoes. walking all the way fro
    11·1 answer
  • What were some of the challenges women faced as American Red Cross nurses and as factory workers?
    7·1 answer
  • What did Hamilton's financial plan include?
    10·1 answer
  • How do you explain the different outcomes of the Reconstruction period, in which the federal government, on the one hand, brough
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!