Answer:
$3,200 overapplied
Explanation:
The computation of the total underapplied or overapplied factory overhead is shown below:
Given that
Actual total factory overhead costs incurred is $45,400
Now Overhead applied to production
= (Total factory overhead application rate per standard DLH × Standard direct labor hours allowed)
= $2.70 × 18,000
= $48,600
As we can see that the overhead applied amount is more than the actual amount so the overhead cost would be overapplied i.e.
= $48,600 - $45,400
= $3,200 overapplied
Answer:
840 breads size oven.
Explanation:
According to Little's law,
Inventory = flow rate × flow time
Inventory (I) is the number of flow units that are currently handled by a business process.
I= unknown
Flow rate (R) is the number of flow units going through the business process per unit time.
R= 4200 breads per hour or 70 breads per minute (4200/60)
Flow time (T) is the amount of time a flow unit spends in a business process from beginning to end.
T= 12 minutes.
Inventory = flow rate × flow time
Inventory = 70 breads per minute × 12 minutes
Inventory = 840 breads size oven
Therefore, for the company to produce 4200 breads per minute, 840 breads size oven is required.
This would be D- an opportunity for True Taste to thrive in their community.
Answer:
b. $150
Explanation:
Standard deduction refers to deduction available to an individual at a flat rate say 30%.Whereas in itemized deductions, an individual can claim deductions at different rates on different items.
Usually itemized deductions are more beneficial to an individual and in case tax saving in these cases exceeds total standard deductions, itemized deductions should be preferred.
In the given case, contribution of $1000 to church shall amount to a deduction. Since the tax rate applicable to the individual is 15%, the savings in tax shall amount to 15% of $1000 i.e $150.
Nate finds the language of the contract to buy bedroom furniture difficult to understand due to "procedural unconscionability".
<h3>What is
procedural unconscionability?</h3>
Unconscionability that results from the contract-making process rather than from a contract's terms that are inherently unfair or unreasonable
Examples of Procedural Unconscionability is-
- influencing an underprivileged party who would not have otherwise signed the contract to do so.
- minimising important clauses in contracts for the sake of the underdog.
- If one side uses threats of violence against the other party, his family, or friends, this is known as coercion.
Therefore, Procedural unconscionability is based on elements that deprive a party of a meaningful choice, such as customer ignorance or a significant amount of unclear fine print.
To know more about elements required in contract-making, here
brainly.com/question/8116487
#SPJ4
