The French would have viewed William Normandy, in general, in a far better light than those in England, since although Normandy had political differences from France is still located on the continent, whereas he launched a famous invasion of England.
Explanation:
William of Normandy<span>, </span>a lot of unremarkably called<span> William the </span>master<span>, was a king </span>WHO<span> won against the Anglo-Saxons at the Battle of Hastings in 1066 AD and </span>so<span> conquered </span>British people<span> isles. Whereas the French saw him as </span>an excellent<span> and noble </span>master<span>, the remaining Anglo-Saxon population in </span>England may need<span> to see him as </span>a far-off<span> tyrant </span>who<span> ravaged their country. </span>
<span>The answer is letter A.
This revolution began and lasted for 65 years. Otto von Bismarck and the Prussian army defeated the Second Empire of Louis Napoleon in France which forced the French to elect government representatives by voting. During this revolution, there were only two parties that dominated the government and these were the monarchist, advocates of the monarchy, and the republicans, people who wanted a government based on a constitution and elections. As a result, an long conflict followed afterwards when the monarchs eventually got most of their roles in the government. <span>
</span></span>
The Berlin Conference was called. They adopted an agreement that allowed a European nation to lay claim to an area of Africa.
This is how Britain and Germany's competing claims over East Africa were settled.
Yes, it gave the federal government the majority of power over money. This mlimted the states control of currency.
Just trying to get points hope you find the answer