All categories

2 years ago

Sam solved the following problem:

Mathematics

1 answer:

kvasek [131]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

-4x > 24

x< 6

Step-by-step explanation:

-4x + 5 > 29

-4x + 5 - 5 > 29 - 5 (subtracted 5 on both sides)

To remove +5, Sam subtracted 5 on both sides. but 29-5 is 24

we always put the sign of greatest number . so its positive

-4x > 24 is correct

-4x/-4 > 24/-4

Dividing both sides by -4 is correct. But when we divide by negative number we need to flip the inequality sign . so > becomes <

x < 6

You might be interested in

<img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B3%7D%7B5%7D%20%2B%5Cfrac%7B5%7D%7B7%7D%20%2B-%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B5%7D" id="TexFormula1"

natali 33 [55]

3/5 + 5/7 = 1 11/35 - 1/5 = 1 4/35 which is your final answer.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A baseball hat for $22.90 at 5% sales tax

vovikov84 [41]

I think it's $21.75 with tax

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

"The manager for State Bank and Trust has recently examined the credit card account balances for the customers of her bank and f

yuradex [85]

Answer:

$P(X = 4 ) = 0.1876$

$P(X \le 4) = 0.8358$

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

The proportion that has outstanding balance is p = 0.20

The sample size is n = 15

Given that the properties of the binomial distribution apply, for a randomly selected number(X) of credit card

$X \ \ ~ Bin (n , p )$

Generally the probability of finding 4 customers in a sample of 15 who have "maxed out" their credit cards is mathematically represented as

$P(X = 4 ) = ^nC_4 * p^4 * (1 - p)^{n-4}$

=> $P(X = 4 ) = ^{15}C_4 * (0.20)^4 * (1 - 0.20)^{15-4}$

Here C stand for combination

=> $P(X = 4 ) = 0.1876$

Generally the probability that 4 or fewer customers in the sample will have balances at the limit of the credit card is mathematically represented as

$P(X \le 4) = [ ^{15}C_0 * (0.20)^0 * (1 - 0.20)^{15-0}]+[ ^{15}C_1 * (0.20)^1 * (1 - 0.20)^{15-1}]+\cdots+[ ^{15}C_4 * (0.20)^4 * (1 - 0.20)^{15-4}]$

=> $P(X \le 4) = 0.8358$

4 0

3 years ago

Peter is interested in designing an experiment to test the probability of tossing a certain number on a fair cube. He will toss

Gnom [1K]

Answer: D

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Is 1/2 an irrational number?

Vinvika [58]

Answer:

Yes, 1/2 is a irrational number

Step-by-step explanation:

This is the answer because (Google research):

A number is rational if we can write it as a fraction where the numerator and denominator are both integers. However, numbers like 1/2, 46485928/2628242, and -3/7 are also rational, since they are fractions whose numerator and denominator are integers.

Hope this helps!

4 0

3 years ago