Answer:
Jackson's official cabinet was sometimes called the parlor cabinet. The Kitchen Cabinet included newspaper editors, political supporters, and old friends of Jackson's. They tended to support him in such efforts as the Bank War, and the implementation of the Spoils System
Explanation:
Boston Tea Party because this made the British Angry causing them to punish the patriots harder
The correct answers are
QUESTION 1: Gettysburg
QUESTION 2: called to end slavery in the South (Confederacy)
QUESTION 3: Vicksburg
QUESTION 4: suspending the right of habeas corpus (prisoner taken before judge before imprisonment), so he could quickly jail confederate sympathizers in the North to preserve the union
What the Nolan Chart's two axes represent is:
b. Personal economic freedom.
This chart, which was created by David Nolan in 1969, divides human political view into two axes: economic opinion and personal opinion, creating something similar to a Chartesian chart.
Those poltical parties on the right of the Chart, tend to favour more economic intervention in personal matters such as drug laws. On the other hand, those to the left, tend to favour more government control in economics. For instance, when governent establishes a minimum wage.
Amendment 13-abolition of slavery throughout us-Dred Scott v Stanford
Amendment 15-right to vote cannot be denied regardless of previous condition-United vs Reese
Amendment 19-women’s suffrage granted them right to vote-minor vs Happersett
Dred vs Scott-This case was about a man living in Illinois (a free state) with a slave (Dred Scott). When Dred Scott's owner died he became a free man, however Sanford's brother in law said otherwise. The laws said that he could be free, but others said that he was still a slave and that because of that he can't be a free man.
Us vs Reese-declared that the 15th amendment did not automatically protect the right of African Americans to vote (only listed the ways that states were not allowed to prevent them from voting)
Minor vs Happersett-presented herself at the polls in St. Louis in 1872 and when the registrar refused to permit her to vote, she and her husband sued him for denying her one of the "privileges and immunities of citizenship"; when they lost the case they appealed to the Supreme Court
I know this was a lot but hope it helped:)
