Violence never really deals with the basic evil of the situation. Violence may murder the murderer, but it doesn’t murder murder. Violence may murder the liar, but it doesn’t murder lie; it doesn’t establish truth. Violence may even murder the dishonest man, but it doesn’t murder dishonesty. Violence may go to the point of murdering the hater, but it doesn’t murder hate. It may increase hate. It is always a descending spiral leading nowhere. This is the ultimate weakness of violence: It multiplies evil and violence in the universe. It doesn’t solve any problems.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Its would most likely mean to betray. The definition is the crime of betraying one's country, especially by attempting to kill the sovereign or overthrow the government.
In <em>Omar Khayyam's "RUBAIYAT OF OMAR KHAYYAM," Edward Fitzgerald </em>noted that pupils of Imam Mowaffak believed that they would all become fabulously rich in this world.
But since there is no certainty in this, the author asks what becomes of the fate of those who could not attain wealthy statuses, despite their strong belief.
Thus, the word<em> "ours" </em>in the first line of the poem refers to the pupils who may fail to become rich, notwithstanding that they <em>strongly believed and hoped</em> for their teacher's lessons to become real in their lives.
Related link: brainly.com/question/17948484
Immigration officials assumed that Chinese travelers would misrepresent themselves to get into America.
-answers.com
:)
