Personally, I don't think so.
Every information we have is by principle, biased. We can never have a full picture on the issue (we don't live long enough to have ALL the information and all the other people's opinions) so this means that we only know a selection of relevant information. This selection biases our perception of the issue: so in this way, I think that we are bound to be at least a little bit biased.
Answer:
solids- stomping foot
liquid-wiggling
gas-jumping
Explanation:
don't ask just make me brainliest
They viewed the setting sun as he suns death
Answer:
Your question is very ambiguous. Assuming that your question is about colonization, I would try my best to answer. Colonization (taking of land) was justified into three categories: God, gold, and glory.
Explanation:
<h2>Europeans justified their colonialism that what their doing is "holy work" because they are widening their religious belief (Christianity) to save indigenous people. They used religion to justified their brutal ways of taking the land away from the "indians" and they believed that by their influence, they were giving them a "better" life. Europeans also justifies their colonization by expanding their kingdom and making them more powerful (glory). Lastly, colonization happened because people seek more riches (gold) and spices. </h2>
