Answer:
collectivized farms & nationalized industry & commerce
established communes for people to live & work together
Explanation:
The purpose of mao's policies is to make all citizens to have an exact same living situation. He collectivized farms and made all the businesses in the country owned by the government so there is no private citizens able to take ownership of resources and accumulate wealth. He established communes for people to live & work together to ensure that all citizens have an exact same condition and make them easier to be organized
They are a form of "budgeted capital" since the money is used for this has been set aside for this purpose
~ Ended the practice of enslaving debtors.
~ Ensured representation of all citizens in the government.
~ Set up people's courts with juries.
~ Established government by an assembly of citizens.
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
The narrative of a shameful "betrayal" or "stabbing in the back" was a story associated with Germany´s defeat in WWI constructed as part of the manipulative Nazi party´s propaganda in the 1930s. Extreme right propaganda usually resorts to victimization and conspirative theories to manipulate historical events and people in a way that serves their political goals.
As someone who was too young at the time to fully appreciate the complexities of the political process at the time, I never understood why the Equal Rights Amendment was never passed. On the one hand, it seems a no-brainer, a basic statement of obvious human rights. However, trying to research online the reasons why it wasn't passed produces a whole bunch of feminist fruitcakery, including some who insist the amendment technically passed and is in effect. The original support for the amendment was among conservative women, while labor unions and "New Deal" types virulently opposed it an exact flip flop of the typical cliches and stereotypes of the political left and right.
My idle speculation is that the trouble stems from the second clause of the amendment as proposed: "The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article." That seems, in an era when people are arguing the constitutionality of mandating health insurance coverage, a loophole big enough through which to ram all sorts of trouble.
