1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
o-na [289]
3 years ago
8

What was one way the consuls were prevented from having too much power?

History
2 answers:
xenn [34]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

B. Consuls could veto each other’s decisions.

Explanation: I took the quiz

GenaCL600 [577]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Consuls could veto each other’s decisions.

Explanation:

In the history of Rome, during the period of Republic consuls had the highest rank in the country, which enabled them to led the army, administrate the political affairs. But, still as the Romans were afraid that the consul could take too much power for himself, they have decided to introduce two consuls, and through that to prevent this type of things from happening. One of days for doing that is the possibility that one consul could veto the decision of the other one.

You might be interested in
Please answer quickly I need help
Misha Larkins [42]
First third and last
5 0
4 years ago
How did WWII impact African Americans at home?
frez [133]

African-Americans were welcomed into certain branches of the armed forces in this war, but, like other wars, there was discrimination and segregation.  Soldiers still fought in segregated units throughout the war, but there were advances in the number of commissioned officers.  Other forms of racism included barring African-Americans from the Marine Corps, Coast Guard, and Army Air Corps, and the Navy only allowed African-Americans as mess men.  These conditions were not promising, and these policies have been called “Jim Crow military”.  Some changes were made with the 1940 Selective Service Training Act which stated that all men between 18 and 36, regardless of race, were eligible to volunteer in naval and ground forces without fear of discrimination.  It also prohibited racial and/or color discrimination in selection and training of military personnel.  This act attempted to change the makeup of the military, but it did not address the underlying issues present such as stereotypes and racism.

African-American soldiers noted the irony and hypocrisy of fighting for freedom and democracy in Europe when they could not enjoy those same privileges in their own country.  This sentiment led to the Double V campaign which worked to end discrimination at home and ensure democracy abroad.  At home this movement was maintained by discrimination in the defense industries and labor unions; racist housing practices were also noted and attempts to change these were part of the Double V campaign.  African-American rights were directly tied to European emancipation.

5 0
4 years ago
Which of the following statements best explains why cities are so densely populated?
Vladimir [108]
D. cities offer a wealth of opportunities for citizens, including jobs, access, education and healthcare
5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLES HELP FREE BRAINLESS How did the actions of Bartolome de las Casa lead to the start of African slavery in the Americas? ОА.
spin [16.1K]

Answer:

OD Bartolome de las Casa helped lead several American Indian uprisings against their forced labor.​

Explanation:

Here is some information that I found

"While the Pope had granted Spain sovereignty over the New World, de Las Casas argued that the property rights and rights to their own labor still belonged to the native peoples. Natives were subjects of the Spanish crown, and to treat them as less than human violated the laws of God, nature, and Spain."

He basically fought against slavery and showed the oppression of the Natives.

Since he fought against Spain this is probably the answer: OD Bartolome de las Casa helped lead several American Indian uprisings against their forced labor.​

Hope this helps! :)

3 0
3 years ago
What advantages and disadvantages might being nonaligned have offered a developing nation during the Cold War?
Anni [7]

Answer:

One advantage is that they did not have to choose sides. Because of this they did not have to be involved in the war. If they had to choose then they would have been forced to be in the war. Another advantage would be that they could trade with any nation because they were neutral. A disadvantage would be that they had no allies, Another would be that the nation did not have support of other nations.

Explanation:

Please do Brainliest:) thank you

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why is the necessary and proper clause a source of ongoing debate
    5·2 answers
  • Why did feudalism develop after the fall of the Roman empire
    5·1 answer
  • Greek and Roman culture survived largely because of the Byzantine empire and its preservation of Greek and Roman A. Architecture
    6·1 answer
  • Southern planters objected to the protective tariff of 1816 because it
    7·2 answers
  • Thomas Jeffersons party took the name
    5·1 answer
  • HELP ASAP easy points
    11·1 answer
  • Wie is de eerste president van Amerika ​
    15·1 answer
  • In what way was maryland different from other english colonies
    6·1 answer
  • What year comes after 1378 BCE?
    14·1 answer
  • What is one benefit of a strong federal government and weaker state governments?
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!