Answer:
Goods that had once been painstakingly crafted by hand started to be produced in mass quantities by machines in factories, thanks to the introduction of new machines and techniques in textiles, iron making and other industries.
Explanation:
Answer:
he was known for the first circumnavigation for the earth
The graph tells you what U.S. money is in different countries like $1 U.S. could stand for $0.76 dollars in Europe please give brainiest please and thank you
He was called Akhenaten
He was an ancient Egyptian pharaoh of the 18th Dynasty who ruled for 17 years. He abandoned the traditional polytheistic worship of Egypt and instituted a quasi-monotheistic faith based on Aten. His social and cultural revolutions were rejected and when he left power,the incoming dynasty destroyed any remnants of him from history until the 19th century when his aten city was discovered.
Answer:
A: A concurring opinion agrees with the majority opinion; a dissenting opinion disagrees with it.
Explanation:
Dissenting opinions serve several purposes. They can help to achieve an appeal review of the case by the full court or by recovering the case materials, verify and clarify issues for a subsequent appeal. With their help, it is possible to achieve the adoption of legislation to make up for possible shortcomings in the rule of law. Dissenting opinions can also help narrow the scope of the decision by pointing out the possible dangers of the majority position, or inform other judges and the bar attorneys about the limitations of any decision and its effect on similar cases in the future. Thus, dissenting opinions can serve as a useful tool in bringing important information to the attention of those interested in judicial decisions and to promote the development of law
.
Concurring opinions are appropriate when they are aimed at achieving greater accuracy in the issue of the impact of the decision, or in this way informing the parties and other audience about important points in the opinion of the author. Thus, judges can give concurring opinions in the case when there are two reasons for the decision, and the majority justifies its decision only on the basis of one of them, and the other judges consider that alternative reasons must also be indicated. The concurring opinion shall include an indication of the reasons for agreeing with the majority opinion. The point is not to present an alternative opinion to the majority opinion, but to indicate the point of difference with it and further outline the contours of the decision.
