Explanation:
Ethical doubts about genetic engineering motivate a view that many philosophers favour: that genetic therapy to eliminate disease and disability is ethically acceptable, given that the risks can be overcome.
But genetic enhancement is ethically problematic. The line between enhancement and therapy is difficult to draw.
Studies show people who are physically attractive are likely to earn more than those considered to have below-average looks. Does this mean “ugliness” is a disability that ought to be corrected by genetic engineering?
Or, similarly, is having a below-average IQ a disability, something that should be subject to change through gene-editing?
I feel bad for you hope you find your dog soon
Walking and even petting dogs appears to be associated with reduced risk of (A)<span> blood pressure and heart rate. Having a walk regularly will help you have a normal blood circulation. It will regulate the pumping of your blood from your heart in a normal way. It will also help you to lose weight and make you healthier.</span>
If a person really wants to achieve a goal such as this one then a person must be dedicated and determined into reaching this goal. In this case, Isaac should train more and play less. It is not going to hurt Isaac one bit staying off the video games or reducing play time for awhile. Responsibilities come first I always believed in work hard first...play hard later.
C or maybe D well it depends if it is professionally or not
