People give different versions of the same story as they want. The Turkish Army Officer Lieutenant Baas' account is important as His first-hand account contradicts the denial.
The Ottoman government in 1916 was known to have massacres a lot of people.
The Armenian genocide denial was a big case in the world. The claim made by the Ottoman Empire and the Committee of Union and Progress (CUP) was that they had no hand in the genocide against the Armenian people during World War I.
This was a very big crime that has a lot of documentation on the numbers of evidences to prove their guilt but they still won't accept that they committed it.
See full question below
Considering that the Ottoman government denied any orders or mass killings, why is Turkish Army Officer Lieutenant Baas' account important?
A. His first-hand account supports the Ottoman government
B. His first-hand account contradicts this denial
C. He had recovered old documents that support the Ottoman government
D. He had recovered old documents that contradict this denial
Learn more about Ottoman government from
brainly.com/question/25798424
Answer:
Christian philosopher and theologian.
Explanation:
yea
This question is incomplete. Here's the complete question.
The excerpt below is from a speech given by President Theodore Roosevelt in 1908.
To permit every lawless capitalist, every law-defying corporation, to take any action, no matter how iniquitous, in the effort to secure an improper profit and to build up privilege, would be ruinous to the Republic and would mark the abandonment of the effort to secure in the industrial world the spirit of democratic fair dealing.
How did President Roosevelt deal with the problem described above?
He proposed federal legislation abolishing corporations.
He refused to enforce patents and copyrights.
He arrested business leaders for unfair practices.
He filed lawsuits to break up "bad trusts."
Answer: He filed lawsuits to break up "bad trusts."
Explanation:
Roosevelt applied what became known as the “Square Deal,” an economic reformation directed to the conservation of natural resources, better control over corporations, and protecting the general consumer. His firm antitrust approach, filing over 40 suits against monopolies, gain him the nickname of the “Trust Buster.”
