1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kari74 [83]
3 years ago
15

How did World War I hurt businesses in Europe even after the war ?

History
2 answers:
kondaur [170]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

A) Businesses struggled to replace skilled workers killed or severely injured in the fighting.

Explanation:

From 1915 the US got tons of loans to the UK to support them in their war effort. It is not a range to say that WWI was the significant factor in providing to the Roaring 20s when the US economy expanded. The long-term outcome was that US engagement in the warheads straight to the Great Depression and WWII.

inysia [295]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The main way in which World War I hurt business in Europe even after the war was that Europe was economically devastated and had focused all their production on war materials, which means there was a lot of goods and services after the war. 

Explanation:

please can i get a brainliest

You might be interested in
Which of these pieces of information would most likely appear in a state Constitution, rather than in the US Constitution?
Verizon [17]

Answer:

C) the date of the Gubernatorial election.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Which statement best describes the significance of the Magna Carta? A.It limited the rights of individuals in order to stop abus
AysviL [449]

Answer:

<u>B. It set limits on the power of the British monarchy.</u>

Explanation:

The Magna Carta (1215) was a charter of rights written by a group of Barons of England that were tired of King John’s tyrannic rule. The charter established a more powerful parliament, granted some liberties of free men such as the right to a trial by jury before punishment and reduced the power of King John, whose rule was perceived as abusive especially toward people and in his imposition of high levies, even in the absence of war.

Its significance lies in the fact that it set limits on the power of the British monarchy by making the King subject to the law, meaning that from that point on, the British crown had to be accountable for their actions under the law, just like everyone else.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Pls help if you TURLY know thiss and NO FILES
disa [49]
I think the answer is A
5 0
3 years ago
The Senators of Sparta were required to be/have over 60 _______.
Nesterboy [21]
<span>The answer would be D.  years old</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Which option best completes the diagram?
svp [43]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Since the employee was upset and lying it was likely the lie in the newspaper was defamation

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which was one of the causes that led to the Great Sioux War in 1876?
    11·1 answer
  • help please!!! In your opinion, what are the most significant cultural contributions of African societies? (Do not address Egypt
    6·1 answer
  • What details would you offer that support the idea of coming to the new world ?
    10·2 answers
  • Conflicts and popular protests in what type of cities at the end of the 19th century included a widespread but ultimately ineffe
    9·2 answers
  • Why did the roads of the Incan empire compromise such a complex network
    13·1 answer
  • After the opening up of a second front with the success of the Normandy invasion on D-Day, British and American troops inflicted
    10·2 answers
  • How might Hindus and Muslims live together in one empire peacefully?
    12·1 answer
  • Circuit learning is defined as
    12·2 answers
  • What important balance did the Missouri Compromise maintain?
    13·1 answer
  • What are two factors that indicate the apostate condition of both Micah and the hired Levite? Use complete sentences.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!