Probably C. Upsetting. Although I'm not sure if option D is cut off?
A; identify the central ideas of the text.
B; form an opinion about the text.
C; list every detail that appears in the text.
D; compare the text with other texts.
Answer:
Explanation:
follow- to go or come after
carry on- to continue
policy- a plan or set of rules
focus on- to pay close attention to, concentrate
split- to divid
affluent- rich
ally- friend and supportive partner
distinguished- important, prominent
judicial- related to courts, the law, judges
Out of these options, the right answer is
D. It's most important to determine whether or not a source is reliable before using it
The other three choices here are very false, in fact.
Hope this is sort of what you were going for! :)
The destruction of any public property, be it statues or historical buildings, is completely unjustifiable. Not only does destroying these artifacts not benefit anyone, but it hurts countless people. From public workers, who'd have to either rebuild or clean up the destroyed property, to people with connections to the monuments having to deal with the losses, no one is benefited by blatant acts of destruction such as these. And, arguably, not even those who commit them.