If a witness offers an out-of-court statement made by

Law

1 answer:

Nookie1986 [14]3 years ago

7 0

The term “hearsay” refers to an out-of-court statement made by someone other than the witness reporting .

Option b

Explanation:

As per the Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(2)(a) evidence is admissible only it is inculpatory. The exculpatory statements collected by the investigator are hearsay and it is not taken as evidence.

Here the term hearsay is defined as proof or documents citing people who are not present in the court. According the law heresy will not take it as evidence because it lacks the first hand witness. While cross examining the person, who as quoted the statement if he is not available then ascertaining the credibility becomes very difficult.

You might be interested in

I need to know answer please brainliest

Eddi Din [679]

I’m not 100% sure but I believe this is how it should go, hope this helps. Distributive Policy: Benefits a large of group, aims to improve the public good, aims to solve major societal problems. Redistributive Policy: benefit a small group of people & uses tax revenue

8 0

2 years ago

Patrick borrowed his friend John’s car to impress a young lady he was dating. It was a new luxury car that John had saved four y

larisa [96]

Answer:

Yes and no.

Patrick would be liable for negligence in allowing the hail damage, as he failed to fulfill his duty of taking reasonable care of the vehicle.

However, he would not be responsible for the hot oil and gravel nicks.

8 0

3 years ago

30 POINTS PLEASE HELP Chris is writing a report on the statistics of those given probation as opposed to those incarcerated. He

tresset_1 [31]

Answer:

Over five million people are under the supervision of the criminal justice systems in the United States. Approximately, 1.6 million are incarcerated in local, state, and federal institutions. The remaining, or almost 70 percent of those under the responsibility of the criminal justice system, are being supervised in the community on probation or parole.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Vaccine Passports: Good or bad public policy?

spayn [35]

Good public policy it makes people

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Section 1 of the Sherman Act. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and the National Federation of State High Scho

GarryVolchara [31]

Answer: No.

Explanation:

The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890, later amended by the Clayton Act (1914) prohibits agreements in restraint of trade and monopolization. I expressely outlaws competing firms to conspire to consolidate the market by unfair means, restraining the trade of others.

In this case, the standards for non-wood bats set by the NCAA and the NFHS are not meant to establish a monopoly and they don´t restrain Marucci´s trade.

8 0

3 years ago