1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lara31 [8.8K]
3 years ago
6

What is another word for unacceptable

English
1 answer:
Keith_Richards [23]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

intolerable , insufferable and impermissible

You might be interested in
Which is the cause of mountain formations?
charle [14.2K]

Answer by YourHope:


Hi! :)


Which is the cause of mountain formations?


A) plate movements!


:)

6 0
3 years ago
5 paragraph essay for difference between knowlege and ignorance
makvit [3.9K]

There are many types of knowledge, and many types of ignorance. They may come from any creed, and any person. But, for now let us speak of two types of knowledge, worldly knowledge and spiritual knowledge. Based on the book “Knowledge on the scriptures” it says: “Knowledge is knowing through personal experience, observation, or study” So, a person acquires knowledge through the use of study and experience as well as observation. For example: How does a person know that it is wrong to put the hand on top on the stove? Because, when they were a child there was the probability that they touched the stove out of curiosity. And, due to that bad experience they learned not to do it again. Spiritual knowledge is acquired through reading the Bible and applying the things in it. Now, let’s speak of worldly knowledge. Where does a person obtain information on the matter? Referring to worldly knowledge the Bible says that it focuses on the desires on “the eyes and flesh” meaning that we go with our own instincts and “be glutted with (our) own counsel” like stated in Proverbs 1:31. When we use worldly knowledge and our own instincts to go forth in life not only will we feel void and empty, but also without purpose. The magazine “What is the purpose of life” states: “Evolutionary scientist Stephen Jay Gould noted: “We may yearn for a higher answer—but none exists.” For such evolutionists, life is a struggle for survival of the fittest, death enduring it all. There is no hope in that view…” However, not all self-wisdom is bad, or without logic.  

James Peterson, also known as the “father of philosophy” has made some grand remarks of the human nature. He one explained that the human has a dark side that we must embrace in order to function properly. And, such a statement is true. In order to turn away from what haunts us, we need to accept what those things are bad within us and realize it. Not suppress it because it will be worse, but, instead become one with it. How do we become one with it? By realizing it is there and doing activities that will release that negative behavior that is inside us like through art, writing, building structure models, etc.  

Focusing on types of ignorance, what is ignorance? Based on the dictionary it is “lack of knowledge and information”. Ignorant or living in ignorance is the person who does not study, does not observe, does not experience in order to learn and achieve things in life.  It is entirely different from the word knowledge. Based on the magazine: "Good will conquer Evil" states, "The apostle Paul’s experience highlights a... reason why people do evil things. Earlier in his life... when he was known by the name Saul, he was “breathing threat and murder” against this very same group. (Acts 9:1, 2) Why did Paul condone and participate in the evil acts perpetrated against the early Christians? “Because I was ignorant,” he says. (1 Timothy 1:13) Yes, Paul formerly had “a zeal for God; but not according to accurate knowledge.”​—Romans 10:2. Like Paul, many sincere people have engaged in evil acts because of a lack of accurate knowledge of God’s will." Yes, ignorance causes people to do things that are wrong and even detestable or unhealthy.

Many people put on blood transfusions. However, is it healthy or even safe? Its true that blood has connection with life. It transports oxygens through the whole body and removes carbon dioxide, it also helps to fight against sicknesses. (Medical World News, December 11, 1989) states: When doctors transplant a heart, a liver, or another organ, the recipient's immune system may sense the foreign tissue and reject it. Yet, a transfusion is a tissue transplant. Even blood that has been "properly" cross matched can suppress the immune system. At a conference of pathologists, the point was made that hundreds of medical papers "have linked blood transfusions to immunologic responses."—"Case Builds Against Transfusions," And, the scientific magazine (Techniques of Blood Transfusion 1982) say's: "other transfusion-associated infectious diseases," such as syphilis, cytomegalovirus infection, and malaria. It then says: "Several other diseases have also been reported to be transmitted by blood transfusion, including herpes virus infections, infectious mononucleosis (Epstein-Barr virus), toxoplasmosis, trypanosomiasis [African sleeping sickness and Chagas' disease], leishmaniasis, brucellosis [undulant fever], typhus, filariasis, measles, salmonellosis, and Colorado tick fever."  Of course, those who have already put on a blood transfusion are not ignorant, just misinformed because there are alternatives to blood transfusions. However, after knowing the possible side effects and consequences then it would be an ignorant step by part of the person to go ahead and put on a blood transfusion.

7 0
3 years ago
10. What final choice does the old woman offer the k
ludmilkaskok [199]
Why are you asking about this
4 0
3 years ago
If war broke out, might it be unlikely that fighting would happen in Britain?
BabaBlast [244]
I think it would be likely.  Britain is a country that is well-developed and has a decent military.  If you are referring to war in London or other big cities, I think the armies would try to keep warfare on the battlefield, not urban areas.  However, to counter that, (correct me if I'm wrong), I believe London is on the water, so a type of naval invasion would be likely.  It also depends on who the fighters are.  Britain v. U.S.A. for example, evacuations of cities would begin, and it's likely we'd see another Refugee Crisis like the one happening now in Europe, but smaller.  But the U.K is part of the U.N., a huge group of unified countries.  If war were to break out, it's likely forces would be pushed out easily with the help of other powers/countries.
7 0
3 years ago
Read this sentence from paragraph 5.
klio [65]

The reasoning in this sentence flawed is - OA. It implies that drones will be used only to protect people from lawbreakers.

1) Paragraph5.

solution: It implies that drones could be used most effective to protect people from lawbreakers

due to

in line with the crucks of passage technology is a powerful tool which could help police forces understand and  equipment to beautify public protection, trap criminals and store life. previously  catching of criminal without technology is a whole lot aggravating venture however lately such a lot of technical device like drone, laser strategies available within the market so one can assist to locate regulation brekers and criminals so that is why option is (A)

2) Paragraph6.

answer:-  He inflates how important drones are to indicate the effect they may have on the everyday lives of residents.

because of

according to the para 6 if tecnology is increasing every day the it's going to impact our privacy we've got heard in the news that such a lot of instaces passed off because of drones and many upcoming new strategies so the we should shop our existence making stron law  for privateness issues.

3) Paragraph 9

solution:- To imphasize that human beings are ignorant of the invasiveness of drones.

according to the passage crucks  the author is informed that at gift so many privacy associated cases located in the international we  must aware of the day by day invasiveness of new techniques like drones, microphone camras to protect ourselves .some humans not lots aware about new invasion tecnology so our responsibility is that to instructed him/her a way to defend from from new strategies.

4) Castillo'd essay.

solution:- people cannot shield their own privacy if maximum drones are undetectable.

in step with the final passage of writer they stated that in the imminent new global drones caarry excessive dimensions cameras and microphone. no one can guard from this. So sturdy privacy policy is the need of an hour globally.

five) Castillo writes from perspective of someone who

solution:-feels worried approximately protective a primary rights.

all the passage truely to that author desires to convey the privacy is most important problems and our duty is that to shield our simple rights from new techniques.

Learn more about passage brainly.com/question/26999874

#SPJ9

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following character traits is most likely asociated with the archetypal mother figure?​
    8·2 answers
  • Solve this riddle: I went to the forest and got it, tried to find it but couldn't see it, so i went home to get it. What am I?
    11·2 answers
  • How old was Shakespeare when he died?
    5·2 answers
  • Choose the Letter of the sentence in which the word is parenthesis is used incorrectly.
    5·2 answers
  • 1. What is telecommunication?
    7·1 answer
  • Who wrote the three brass pennies?
    10·2 answers
  • What’s the correct sentence
    13·1 answer
  • Does anyone have any ideas for my Slenderman song?
    12·1 answer
  • Question: In the context of the story, can we control our fate? Do our choices have an impact on the course of our lives, or are
    13·1 answer
  • Hi i am student of languages and I need know if my answers are correct. Help me please!!!
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!