This is how I would go: (I'm just glossing over it, sorry if you think it lacks detail. :L)
<span>1. California does not deserve a seat in the United Nations. </span>
<span>2. The UN is only for nations; people in California are US citizens; they do not have a culture nor a culture that is exclusive to the rest of the US. In this sense, California is not a nation. (this is the definition of a nation bit.) </span>
<span>3. Federalism, the system where states and national governments share power. California (states in general) does not have the power to enter into treaties with foreign countries, nor regulate commerce with foreign countries. These powers are exclusive to the national government. This would mean that it cannot be given a seat, where these powers would be put into California's hands. I guess states governments would also fit into here somewhere. </span>
Answer:
b. resulted in a loss of support for Federalists in southeastern Pennsylvania.
Explanation:
This was the third tax revolt of the eighteenth century which took place between 1799 to 1800. Fries rebellion was a rebellion by the farmers of Pennsylvania against the house tax. The tax was levied on the dwelling houses and land directly by the federal government. However, the tax was levied by counting the number of windows of a house and the farmers consider it unjust. John Fries led the rebellion and tried for treason. And thus federal government lost support of this region.
The answer to the question is passive resistance
Hahahaahbwnefieo3aejfowjj3oe im a ahooeoewe
