Whenever a research is done, you must reject or accept a null hypothesis (the one you consider is not correct) or your work hypothesis (the theory you think is must probably accurate or close to the truth) usually, when performing a research, you will not always obtain positive or statistically significant results, that validate your hypothesis. Is actually, not unusual that extremes (or extraordinary results) come out (unexpected for several reasons: incorrect size of the sample, improper selection of the subjects- a bias- lack of correct determination of the variable measured or failure to determine the type of the variable-numerical, categorical, ratio,etc-)
Positive or negative results are yet, results whether they prove or reject your hypothesis. Failing to establish a scientific hypothesis does not necessarily mean that they did something wrong, it just says that the hypothesis tested does not approach correctly to the epistemological truth (ultimately, any research is only a mere approximation to reality). Therefore, when two scientists deny sharing<em> unusual results</em>, they are acting unethically, hiding results that can mean something from a different point of view.
reference
Nicholson, R. S. (1989). On being a scientist. Science, 246(4928), 305-306.
Answer:
gave authority to develop a program of rehabilitation of our banking facilities. ... The new law allows the twelve Federal Reserve Banks to issue additional currency on good assets and thus the banks that reopen will be able to meet every legitimate call.
Options available are:
A) Wait until the next day; maybe the children will be ready to discuss it later.
B) Pause periodically and ask the children to explain or "recap" what has happened thus far in the story and to ask questions about anything that is unclear.
C) Tell the children to listen carefully an+9d reread the story aloud very slowly to facilitate understanding.
D) Stop reading the story until students are more engaged in the text.
Answer:
B) Pause periodically and ask the children to explain or "recap" what has happened thus far in the story and to ask questions about anything that is unclear.
Explanation:
The right answer is Option B due to the following reasons:
1. By pausing periodically, and ask the children to explain or "recap" what has happened thus far in the story, will encourage the children to be involved, by trying to impress the teacher that they are actively following the teacher or the story. With such strategy, those students will want to listen attentively to be get what the teacher is reading, and then narrate it when asked.
2. By letting them to ask questions about anything that is unclear, will not only give room to for students to get clarification about any ambiguity in the story, but also give room for interactions with the teacher, and opportunity to evaluate when and where they seem lost in the story.
