The main reason why Americans were able to overthrow the English government and create a democratic republic while many Latin Americans failed to create and maintain democratic governments is that these were two different historical processes.
Thus, while the American Revolution had its origin in a specific problem in the colonies, which was that of the taxes established by the British crown and the malaise generated in America by such a situation; Latin American revolutions occurred due to the power vacuum that occurred after Napoleon's conquest of Spain, that is, for a reason that was external to that of the colonies.
This, in turn, prevented a historical revolutionary process from taking place in the Latin American case, which led to independence without a clear objective in many cases, which was the catalyst for subsequent political conflicts in these nations.
Learn more in brainly.com/question/20416123
You need to put pictures so that people can help.
<span>Agricultural subsidies are supposed to lower food prices and help farmers. However, they don't always do either. Moreover, lower food prices and more farmers have their own social costs.
The truth is that all across the world farmers are getting more efficient and can grow and harvest more crops with fewer people. That isn't about to change any time soon, and there's very little government can do about it.
There are several ways you can go about subsidizing agriculture, for example:
<span>Direct cash payments to farmersQuotas and production controlsLabor lawsTax creditsProviding water and electricity at reduced prices</span>And so forth.
The problem is that, as time goes on, everyone gets used to the system and it gets out of whack with actual demand. For example, tobacco use has been steadily dropping, but tobacco farmers still get subsidies (either to grow or not to grow) and the Western nations grow tobacco to export (along with the health detriment, which is now hitting Africa and China).
As another example, corn is cheap, but the U.S. produces about five times as much now as it did in 1940, although the population has only doubled. As such, a lot of it is just fed to livestock. More problematically, a lot of it is exported to Mexico, where corn can be grown more cheaply, but can't be sold against subsidized American corn, which costs less.
Here in Canada, there is a quota system for dairy which means we don't produce much surplus. However, at retail, milk cost about twice here what it does in the U.S. We can't figure out how to dismantle the system so at least milk will cost about the same as it does in other countries. Trying to dismantle the system might be more expensive than leaving it in place. It might also mean more milk is produced than is consumed, which would again push the market out of whack.</span>
Answer:
I believe those options are wrong since the correct answer should be quartering act
You need to have the full question for me to answer.
