The statement regarding "The Missouri Compromise, 1820."which is true is A<u> ----No new territories would be allowed to have </u><u>slavery.</u>
<u></u>
<h3>What was the purpose of the Missouri Compromise?</h3>
The purpose of the Missouri Compromise was to maintain a balance between the number of slave states and the number of free states in the Union. It permits Missouri to enter as a slave state at the same Maine would be as a free state, thus maintaining a balance in numbers of free and slave states<u>.</u>
<u></u>
<h3>What was the Missouri Compromise ?</h3>
The Missouri Compromise of 1820, was a law that tried the attention of growing sectional tensions over the issue of slavery. By passing this law, President James Monroe signed, the U.S. Congress admitted Missouri to the Union as a state that allowed slavery, and Maine regarded as a free state.
Learn more about Missouri Compromise:
brainly.com/question/14383383
#SPJ1
The correct answer is C. Redeemer
Explanation:
In U.S. history, the Reconstruction (1863-1877) was the period that followed the Amerian Civil War and during which important social changes and changes in civil rights occurred; indeed during the Reconstruction rights were guaranteed to free slaves and those states that had belonged to the Confederacy were integrated again. However, these changes were still opposed by some, especially by those that lived in the south and wanted to preserved the traditions and white supremacy that existed before the Civil War and because of this the Redeemers were created which refer to a coalition of those white southerners that oppose the changes of the Reconstruction and aimed at getting power and continue with the white supremacy stopping the changes of the Reconstruction, also they oppose the carpetbagger and scalawags that supported the Reconstruction. Therefore, the term used to refer to the southerners that tired to overturn the changes of the Reconstruction was Redeemers.
THIS IS 100% correct! *change is an underlying theme to understanding expansion and encounters through history.* I got this wrong on Odyssey ware by listening to everyone else, came back to prevent this from happening again.
Answer:
It distracted them from Vietnam War
Explanation:
Not every American citizen or politician was satisfied with the results of Johnson’s Great Society agenda. And some resented what they saw as government handouts and felt the government should butt out of American’s lives altogether.
In 1968, President Richard M. Nixon set out to undo or revamp much of the Great Society’s legislation. He and other Republicans still wanted to help the poor and the needy, but wanted to cut the red tape and reduce costs. Nixon wasn’t completely successful, however, and the political infighting for social reform has been raging ever since.
Despite Johnson’s Great Society having a lasting impact on almost all future political and social agendas, his success was overshadowed by the Vietnam War. He was forced to divert funds from the War on Poverty to the War in Vietnam.
And despite the enormous amount of legislation passed by his administration, Johnson is seldom remembered as a champion of the underprivileged and at-risk. Instead, he’s arguably better known as the commander-in-chief who forced America into an unwinnable war that resulted in over 58,000 American military fatalities.
The Great Society was an ambitious series of policy initiatives, legislation and programs spearheaded by President Lyndon B. Johnson with the main goals of ending poverty, reducing crime, abolishing inequality and improving the environment. In May 1964, President Lyndon B. Johnson laid out his agenda for a “Great Society” during a speech at the University of Michigan. With his eye on re-election that year, Johnson set in motion his Great Society, the largest social reform plan in modern history.
