Which of the following describes a disadvantage secondary sources have compared to primary sources

1 answer:

6 0

There's no answer choices listed, so here's the best I can do:

Secondary sources come from people who have only read or heard about an event, so there is a possibility that they don't know the full story or they will mix in lies. With a primary source, you will get the full story and the truth.

Hope I'm not too late, and I hope this helps :)

You might be interested in

Do you no the answer

IrinaVladis [17]

Where is your question ?

8 0

3 years ago

Five of the nations located on the Balkan Peninsula joined the members of the old Triple Entente to become the Allied nations. W

dem82 [27]

Answer:

Balkan joined Bulgaria

Explanation:

give 5 starts a thanks

3 0

2 years ago

How did woodrow wilson describe the u.s. goal in entering world war i?

Naddik [55]

From the outbreak of World War I, Woodrow Wilson pursued two goals: a non-punitive peace settlement to end the conflict and a reformation of world politics ... In his speech to Congress on 2 April 1917 which asked for a declaration of war, he stated,

8 0

3 years ago

Which would have been a common life change in England during the Industrial Revolution?

Serggg [28]

A farmer moves to an industrial area to work in a coal mine.

Explanation:

During the time of industrial revolution in England, the economy in that country moved from the primary to the secondary sector of the country. There were more people who were dependent on factories and industries for earning their livelihood as compared to be dependent on the agriculture for the same purpose. In this incident also, a farmer left his farm work and started to work in an industry and improved his standards of living.

5 0

3 years ago

Why did political instability occur in the region after independence

OlgaM077 [116]

I think the answers are B,and D

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers