The figure of speech "glass half full?", it refers to the fact that Trey is optimistic.
<h3>What is figure of speech "glass half full" meaning?</h3>
Basically, a figure of speech means the word or phrase that has a meaning something different than its literal meaning and here, we are to talk about the meaning of "glass half full".
The idea of the figure of speech is that if one says that the glass is half empty, one will see the world in a negative or pessimistic way but If one say the glass is half full, you have a more optimistic viewpoint.
Hence, by virtues of the figure of speech "glass half full?", it refers to the fact that Trey is optimistic as he pointed out how this was just an opportunity to pursue bigger and better things.
Therefore, the Option A is correct.
Read more about glass half full
brainly.com/question/10713995
#SPJ1
Truck question America is not on a hill and it is not a city
Answer:
D is your answer
Explanation:
If you read all the answers A and B doesn't make sense to be the answer to your question. C also doesn't fit because it's not talking about the woman going strike or having their opinion, so your answer is D.
The ruling determined that the Judiciary Act of 1789 was unconstitutional.
In doing so, the Supreme Court asserted that it has the right to declare laws of Congress unconstitutional.
It was sort of a roundabout way in which the principle of judicial review was asserted by the Supreme Court in the case of Marbury v. Madison. William Marbury had been appointed Justice of the Peace for the District of Columbia by outgoing president John Adams -- one of a number of such last-minute appointments made by Adams. When Thomas Jefferson came into office as president, he directed his Secretary of State, James Madison, not to deliver many of the commission papers for appointees such as Marbury. Marbury petitioned the Supreme Court directly to hear his case, as a provision of the Judiciary Act of 1789 had made possible. The Court said that particular provision of the Judiciary Act was in conflict with Article III of the Constitution, and so they could not issue a specific ruling in Marbury's case (which they believe he should have won). But the bottom line was, the Court had taken up the right of judicial review by calling out a portion of the Judiciary Act of 1789 as unconstitutional.
