True. This is around the time WW1 started.
Answer:
im doing the same test im in oca
Explanation:
In the 1930's than in any other generation of women in the twentieth century.
The correct answer is B) The Federal Reserve:
Since the beginning of the crisis in August 2007, central banks have shown a great capacity for reaction. They have also acted both to avoid a systemic banking crisis and to limit the impact on growth. In addition, the US Federal Reserve eased monetary policy by injecting liquidity and, eventually, acting on interest rates.
Banks are traditionally financed by borrowing money in the short term in the interbank market. But the financial crisis that began in 2007 has been characterized by a great mutual distrust among banks, which led to an increase in interbank rates. Interbank rates far exceeded the central bank's guide rate. In addition, central banks have intervened massively to inject liquidity, hoping to reduce money market tensions and restore confidence. The monetary policy has also been characterized by an extension of the duration of the loans, an extension of the guarantees and the possibility of obtaining refinancing.
In addition to providing liquidity, in order to reduce the impact of the financial crisis on growth, the Fed has lowered its guideline considerably, which has gone from 6% at the beginning of 2007 to 0.5% at the end of 2008. On the other hand, the ECB has not lowered its guideline type.
Invasions by Barbarian tribes. ...
Economic troubles and overreliance on slave labor. ...
The rise of the Eastern Empire. ...
The most important reason for the collapse of Rome was the failure to actually integrate what they conquered. When Roman soldiers conquered new lands, it was rare that they ever attempted to force their culture, ideals, or laws upon the natives and barbarians. Thus, when the Empire began suffering internal struggles, the natives they had conquered decided to take action, which lead to the swift collapse by barbarian invasion from all sides. It's hard to pick a LEAST important reason, seeing that there were many of them, but I suppose a contender would most likely be the common refusal of the Empire to even acknowledge that barbarians were rising. On the outer edges of their territory, in places like Gaul and Morocco, the Roman government was reluctant to even recognize the threat of the barbarians, thinking that even accepting that these barbarians were causing trouble would weaken their prestige in the public eye.
