One argument in support of pet cloning is that cloning "brings many pet owners joy." People who lose a beloved pet can clone the animal and feel that love again. While cloned animals are not the exact same as the original, clones do share some distinctive traits.
One argument against pet cloning is that cloning is unnatural. These people believe that cloning does not happen in nature, so people should not clone animals. The author of this article believes the positive aspects of cloning outweigh the negative ones.
Answer:
euphemism
Explanation:
downsizing is a more "polite" or less harsh word to stand for layoffs or firing staff
Answer:
you could ask to do both, maybe work part time and come home and finish up some chores win win
Explanation:
Pretty sure it was 3 times . i’m positive
Answer:
Explanation:
In the early 1800s (1801 to 1805, depending on the source), Thomas Young conducted his experiment. He allowed light to pass through a slit in a barrier, so it expanded out in wavefronts from that slit as a light source (under Huygens' Principle). In turn, that light passed through the pair of slits in another barrier (carefully placed the right distance from the original slit). Each slit, in turn, diffracted the light as if they were also individual sources of light. The light impacted an observation screen. This is shown to the right.
When a single slit was open, it impacted the observation screen with greater intensity at the center. It then faded as you moved away from the center. There are two possible results of this experiment:
Particle interpretation: If light exists as particles, the intensity of both slits will be the sum of the power from the individual slits.
Wave interpretation: If light exists as waves, the light waves will have interference under the principle of superposition, creating bands of light (constructive interference) and dark (destructive interference).
