The effect on the reader by knowing the true background of the photo is shown by thees two statements- Firstly ,It makes the reader consider the idea that the media doesn’t always tell the true story (A),Secondly (C) It shows the reader that when it comes to persuasive media, you can’t always trust what you see.
Explanation:
The effect on the reader after discovering the true background of the picture is stated by the below mentioned statements:-
- <u>It makes the reader consider the idea that the media doesn’t always tell the true story</u>-It means that the media creates a hype of small things ,rather than communicating the true story it simply exaggerate the story and presents it in front of its viewers
- <u> It shows the reader that when it comes to persuasive media, you can’t always trust what you see</u>-As mentioned in the earlier statement that the media tries to show people what they want to see in a manipulative way,the true story is always hidden or manipulated in the way media wants to portray it in front of the people.
Answer:
lines 10 though 14
I think I'm sorry if I'm we
Answer:
3.45 x 10^5
Explanation:
Basically, do distributive property...
No charges at all even though he was the most mysterious out of them all he was the one with the most sense sort of angel like
The correct answer is; presenting dialogue that includes a contrasting perspective.
Indeed, there is a hint of irony in the description that immediately follows the dialogue. The immediate landscape is used to show the “heritage-deprived” person that he actually does have a heritage. In other words, he does not need to be a hyphenated American in order to have a heritage because it is right there “dangling over his head”.
The symbolism of the “tall American tree” is used to show how the speaker of these lines that America has its own heritage, which lies in its history, its melting pot and its territory and he cannot even see it. It is this symbolism that provides the contrasting perspective.
