Answer:
Many of the Democrats, especially New Leftists supported this. Many Republicans did not like this act. There was political outrage.
There was a big crowd outside the Convention in protest of the Vietnam War. I don't think either party liked that. It didn't really change views, but protesters, police, and bystanders clashed.
Vietnam Protests were controversial. It affected the political views of people in different ways. The Democrats helped get the U.S. involved in the war and the Republicans also helped fuel it. Both parties' views were affected in different ways based on the individual and their beliefs.
Explanation:
<span>It s true that the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution gave President Johnson the power to expand U.S. involvement in Vietnam. During the time that the resolution was passed the president gained an unlimited power to oppose any communist aggression in Southeast Asian Countries, as it expnad its military role in the Cold War battlefield in Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia.</span>
Answer:
<h2>A state of virtual slavery </h2>
Explanation:
Sharecropping was the system in which the landowner gives plots of land to a tenant in exchange for a share of harvest. It allowed the tenants to produce more to stay tied to the land.
In the southern US black families rented lands from the white owners and raised crops like rice, tobacco and cotton. The landlords and merchant used to lease the equipment credit, food, fertilisers and seeds on credit until the harvest season.
But this system was not different from slavery as unpredictable harvests, high interest rates kept the black families indebted and the debts had to cried over to the next year. The laws which required the harvest to be sold only to the landlord and prevented the former slaves from changing their landlord if they were indebted to them.
Two third of all the sharecroppers were white and one third were black. Sharecropping faded away in 1940's due to mechanisation, great depression and various other factors in 1940's.
Answer:
Thank you!! Same to you ❤️