1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
salantis [7]
3 years ago
10

After talking with Elizabeth in act 4, what does John decide to do? A stay silent and be hanged because Elizabeth convinces him

that he is a good man. B) only confess if they agree to release Elizabeth also. C) confess because staying silent would imply that he has never lied be hanged because he deserves to die for his adultery—not for witchcraft
English
1 answer:
FromTheMoon [43]3 years ago
6 0
After talking with Elizabeth in act 4, John decides to C. <span>confess because staying silent would imply that he has never lied be hanged because he deserves to die for his adultery—not for witchcraft.</span>
You might be interested in
What is the plural of leaf Use a dictionary if necessary.
Paul [167]
The answer is leaves
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the moral,or lesson, of "kungfu panda 3"?
8090 [49]
The moral or lesson is to never give up in you dreams or goals! hope it helps!
4 0
3 years ago
I know this is a dumb question but, is daughters-in-law a proper noun.
Marrrta [24]
No...it is not a proper noun.
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Compose a seven to nine sentence response to the prompt: How would you compare Zimbardo’s argument that situations cause people
8_murik_8 [283]

In the first text, Zimbardo argues that people are neither "good" or "bad." Zimbardo's main claim is that the line between good and evil is movable, and that anyone can cross over under the right circumstances. He tells us that:

"That line between good and evil is permeable. Any of us can move across it....I argue that we all have the capacity for love and evil--to be Mother Theresa, to be Hitler or Saddam Hussein. It's the situation that brings that out."

Zimbardo argues that people can move across this line due to phenomena such as deindividualization, anonymity of place, dehumanization, role-playing and social modeling, moral disengagement and group conformity.

On the other hand, Nietzsche in "Morality as Anti-Nature" also argues that all men are capable of good and evil, and that evil is therefore a "natural" part of people. However, his opinion is different from Zimbardo in the sense that Nietzsche believes that judging people as "good" and "bad" is pointless because morality is anti-natural, and we have no good reason to believe that our behaviour should be modified to fit these precepts.

8 0
3 years ago
Benefits or drawbacks of online college courses?
trapecia [35]
To find a good college school that has good sleeping arrangments
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Consider the principles of the school of formalism. Which type of theory (according to M. H. Abrams) explains the focus of the s
    10·1 answer
  • What is revealed through dialogue about the womens feelings paris
    7·1 answer
  • In his speech about the rising cost of textbooks, Eli said, "For example, let’s imagine that there is a college student named Jo
    6·1 answer
  • What is 19/20 - 9/16 =
    8·1 answer
  • Is i drink to a foeman worthy of my steel a metaphor
    6·1 answer
  • Our teacher said ,"what are you doing now?" change to indirect speech​
    5·2 answers
  • Examples of similes in the hobbit
    14·1 answer
  • please say me fast dont say i don't know, if you know then say if you don't know don't need to say I don't know ​
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following pieces of information would NOT need to be documented in an
    14·1 answer
  • face revealㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ​
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!