In the first text, Zimbardo argues that people are neither "good" or "bad." Zimbardo's main claim is that the line between good and evil is movable, and that anyone can cross over under the right circumstances. He tells us that:
"That line between good and evil is permeable. Any of us can move across it....I argue that we all have the capacity for love and evil--to be Mother Theresa, to be Hitler or Saddam Hussein. It's the situation that brings that out."
Zimbardo argues that people can move across this line due to phenomena such as deindividualization, anonymity of place, dehumanization, role-playing and social modeling, moral disengagement and group conformity.
On the other hand, Nietzsche in "Morality as Anti-Nature" also argues that all men are capable of good and evil, and that evil is therefore a "natural" part of people. However, his opinion is different from Zimbardo in the sense that Nietzsche believes that judging people as "good" and "bad" is pointless because morality is anti-natural, and we have no good reason to believe that our behaviour should be modified to fit these precepts.
A. Would be correct because mayor is the subject and lives being the verb.
I agree with the person above me! in other words, i think the answer is B: he is hiding out to escape from his former situation.
have a great day bye !! :)
Answer:
Appearing on the Ten Most Wanted list brought the gangster nationwide
<em><u>Notoriety.</u></em>
List of words:
exclusive
snobbish
palatial
massive
renown
notoriety
tolerate
accept
Explanation:
Notoriety means being famous for a bad deed. Hope this helped and have a wonderful day! <3 :)
