Answer:
The set of the first 10 amendments to the Constitution of the United States.
Explanation:
Bill of Rights is the name given to the set of the first 10 amendments to the United States Constitution, approved as a consequence of political pressure exerted by the anti-federalists, who wanted to guarantee that the individual rights of citizens were not curtailed by eventual tyrannical governments, and ratified in 1791.
Thus, these amendments began to protect the individual as a subject of rights, based on the principles of the Enlightenment and understanding man as the bearer of the fundamental rights to life and liberty. Thus, they guaranteed these rights to American citizens (not to African Americans, who were not considered citizens).
In 1896, in the case of Plessy v. Ferguson, the Supreme Court declared the "separate but equal" doctrine. It upheld the rights of governments to set up separate schools and separate public facilities for blacks and whites so that blacks and whites could be "equal." However, they were far from equal.
Explanation:
The place of Latin and the heritage of the ancient Roman world
Latin developed from a local dialect of central Italy to become the official language of ancient Rome, transmitting Roman law, government, literature and social and cultural knowledge and values throughout much of Europe, North Africa and West Asia during the period 753 BCE – 476 CE. The period for the study is 1st century BCE to 1st century CE when some of the most influential Latin literature extant was written.
Answer:
Explanation:
Consequentialism is the view that morality is all about producing the right kinds of overall consequences. Here the phrase “overall consequences” of an action means everything the action brings about, including the action itself. For example, if you think that the whole point of morality is (a) to spread happiness and relieve suffering, or (b) to create as much freedom as possible in the world, or (c) to promote the survival of our species, then you accept consequentialism. Although those three views disagree about which kinds of consequences matter, they agree that consequences are all that matters. So, they agree that consequentialism is true. The utilitarianism of John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham is a well known example of consequentialism. By contrast, the deontological theories of John Locke and Immanuel Kant are nonconsequentialist.
Consequentialism is controversial. Various nonconsequentialist views are that morality is all about doing one’s duty, respecting rights, obeying nature, obeying God, obeying one’s own heart, actualizing one’s own potential, being reasonable, respecting all people, or not interfering with others—no matter the consequences.
This article describes different versions of consequentialism. It also sketches several of the most popular reasons to believe consequentialism, along with objections to those reasons, and several of the most popular reasons to disbelieve it, along with objections to those reasons.
Im pretty sure it was suffragists because it was the womens suffrage that gave them the right to vote
