The first answer is actually simple. The reason is because the constitution allows it. Other than this simple answer, another reason is because it's fair. What I mean by "fair" is that the final decision would be completely unbiased, not giving any advantages to both parties.
The second question is completely your opinion. Generally speaking, most people could care less about jury duties of any kind.
The third question depends on where you live. Like the question says, just google it.
I would also recommend going back to the pages of the book (38-40). My answers may not be necessarily correct depending on what the textbook you're using states.
They increase participation in politics, provide a central cue for citizens to cast informed votes, and organize the business of Congress and governing.
Hitler had always wanted to see Germany expand eastwards to gain Lebensraum or 'living space' for its people. After the fall of France Hitler ordered plans to be drawn up for an invasion of the Soviet Union. He intended to destroy what he saw as Stalin's 'Jewish Bolshevist' regime and establish Nazi hegemony.
yes because the sit-in is a type of seated position demonstration it also consists in occupying a space on the public highway, in a public building or a private establishment and in staying there for a determined time or as long as possible until forced evacuation
