Answer:
$30.59
Explanation:
<em>Note that the FIFO method is used for this question</em>
Equivalent Units
Materials = 5,200 x 100 % + 300 x 100 % = 5,500
Conversion Costs = 400 x 55 % + 5,200 x 100 % + 300 x 35 % = 5,525
Total Costs
Materials = $25,200
Conversion Costs = $143,700
Cost per Equivalent unit
Materials = $25,200/5,500 = $4.58
Conversion Costs = $143,700/5,525 = $26.01
Total Cost = $4.58 + $26.01 = $30.59
<u>Conclusion</u>
The cost of completing a unit during the current period was $30.59
The main difference of the two is the kind of employers who can offer the saving plans. For 403(b) saving plans, this applies to nonprofit companies, schools, government organizations, hospitals and religious groups. They are exempt of some administrative processes making it less costly compared to 401(k) savings plan. 401(k) savings plan is applied on private companies.
Answer:
equilibrium price would fall and equilibrium quantity would increase
Explanation:
The discovery would reduce the amount of crops now lost to frost damage and increase the supply of crops e.g. potato.
As a result of the increase in supply, there would be an excess of supply over demand equilibrium price would fall and quantity would increase
Please check the attached image for a graph showing increase in supply
Under the condition that country X can manufacture cars more cheaply. An absolute advantage devours in a country if it makes good over alternative country and uses a smaller amount of wealth to yield that good. The result of a country’s natural legacy is the absolute advantage. Another example is extracting oil in Saudi Arabia is pretty much just a matter of drilling a hole. Generating oil in other countries can is essential substantial exploration and costly technologies for drilling and extraction if certainly they have any oil at all. The United States devours about the richest farmland in the world which manufacture it at ease to grow corn and wheat than in many other countries. Guatemala and Colombia partake environment particularly suitable for growing coffee. Chile and Zambia have about of the world’s richest copper mines. As some have claimed that geography is destiny. Chile will bargain copper and Guatemala will harvest coffee and they will trade. When each country has a product others necessity and it can be manufactured with fewer resources in one country over another then it is easy to visualize all parties do good from trade. Thinking about trade just in relations of geography and absolute advantage is incomplete. Trade actually happens because of comparative advantage.
It cant be B because the exit wound is usually big , so im going with A
