Answer:
<h2>be completely powerful</h2>
<u>Further details:</u>
Thomas Hobbes published a famous work called <em>Leviathan</em> in 1651. The title "Leviathan" comes from a biblical word for a great and mighty beast. Hobbes believed government is formed by people for the sake of their personal security and stability in society. In Hobbes' view, once the people put a king (or other leader in power), then that leader needs to have supreme power (like a great and mighty beast). Hobbes' view of the natural state of human beings without a government held that people are too divided and too volatile as individuals -- everyone looking out for his own interests. So for security and stability, authority and the power of the law needs to be in the hands of a powerful ruler like a king or queen. And so people willingly enter a "social contract" in which they live under a government that provides stability and security for society.
Probably the most famous set of lines from Hobbes' <em>Leviathan</em> book describes what he saw as the natural state of human affairs without government -- one in which every individual had freedom, but that meant it was a situation of "war of all against all," or we might say, every man for himself. Hobbes wrote:
- <em>In such condition, there is no place for industry; because the fruit thereof is uncertain: and consequently no culture of the earth; no navigation, nor use of the commodities that may be imported by sea; no commodious building; no instruments of moving, and removing, such things as require much force; no knowledge of the face of the earth; no account of time; no arts; no letters; no society; and which is worst of all, continual fear, and danger of violent death; and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.</em>
Answer:
Laissez-faire, or free market capitalism, is an ideology that prescribes minimal public enterprise and government regulation in a capitalist economy.
Answer: a. there was a strong tendency to come from a business-elite background (76%)
Explanation:
Beth Mintz and Peter Freitag analyzed the backgrounds of every cabinet member serving between 1897 and 1973. Not only did they found that 66% of them could be considered as part of the upper class before getting their cabinet jobs, but also that more than 76% of them were connected with prominent corporations, and 90% of them came either from upper class or were linked with those corporations.
Douglass drew on the custom of natural law in his argument
against slavery. The past of Western equality and political belief places a strong
importance on fairness and social development, which Douglass contended must
have successively prejudiced the general ideas of America’s founding documents.
According to Douglass, slavery also opposed the formation story of the
Christian Bible, which states God “hath made of one blood all lands of men for
to live on all the face of the earth.” According to Douglass, the Bible’s assertion
of worldwide brotherhood, produced it to become a natural law that would have
affected the framers' conscripting of the Constitution.
