a stronger central government took place. Measures were also taken to check that power. The first census was taken since Roman periods and a law making legislature was formed.
<em><u>If a power was not specified under the Articles of Confederation, the State would be responsible for it.
</u></em>
Further Explanations:
Articles of Confederation an agreement within the 13 States of former America which was also of the first constitution. When all 13 states gave their consent to the Articles it came into effect on 1781. This article clearly conveyed the distrust among the populace of the nation in regards to a sturdy central government within the nation. It was also the beginning of “American Revolution” and other issue which the Articles lacked. Judiciary became a problem as there were disputes amid the states and they always hoisted against each other in courts. The problems were viewed by the framers who framed the constitution and wanted to make all states to co-operate with each other. Article of Confederation was in effect for 8 years and was then replaced by the present constitution in the year 1789.
Apart from this one another drawback was that if a particular authority is not stated under the Article of confederation then the State would be responsible for implementing it.
Learn More
- Which of these was one of the few successes of the United States government under the articles of confederation?<u>brainly.com/question/6639139
</u>
- Why did Pope Gregory vii and henry iv come into conflict?<u>brainly.com/question/1546461
</u>
- Which explains why Supreme Court justices are given lifetime appointments? <u>brainly.com/question/701144
</u>
<u>
</u>
Answer Details
Grade: High School
Subject: History
Chapter: Articles of Confederation
Keywords:
Articles of Confederation,America,first constitution, Articles, 1781, the nation, American Revolution, Judiciary, constitution,8 years, 1789,State, implementing
Illinois Case (Wabash Case) involved a railroad company, Wabash, St. ... The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1886 that Illinois' granger laws were unconstitutional because they attempted to control interstate commerce, which had been deemed a responsibility of the federal government by Gibbons v.
