Due to who was settled in the surrounding areas, Christianity was the primary religion and of course was spread.
Hi!
The main comparison we can make between Rome and Byzantium is that they had different forms of religion.
The Roman people focused on worshipping Jupiter as a father of all 'gods', while the Byzantium people were just monotheistic.
If you are unaware of the term, monotheistic is basically only believing in and worshipping one and only one god. Polytheistic is the belief in <em>multiple </em>gods.
A similarity between the two empires was that they both gained entertainment from watching <span>gladiator </span>fights!
They often built large structures known as Coliseums in order to hold huge events where the gladiator fights occurred.
Hopefully, this helps! =)
Categorical comparison is not a pattern for organizing an informative speech
Explanation:
<u>Instead of Categorical Comparison, the process of chronological comparison is employed for the development of an informative speech.</u>
<u>The objective of an informative speech is to convey as much information as possible in a clear and concise manner</u> and as such these different types of strategies help one to achieve that with clarity and with maximum efficiency in conveying the information to the listeners.
Presumably, someone would say the white man. But, it is a trick question and the answer is The President.
When an argument is deductively valid, its <u>truth of premises </u>guarantee the truth of its <u>conclusion</u>.
<h3>What is a deductively valid argument?</h3>
A deductive argument is an argument intended by the arguer to be deductive, that is, to provide a guarantee of the truthfulness of the conclusion provided that the premises of the argument are true.
It can also be expressed by saying that, in a deductive argument, the premises are intended to provide strong support for the conclusion that if the premises were true, the conclusion could not be false.
The argument in which the premise succeeds in securing the conclusion is called a valid (inferential) argument. If a valid argument has a true premise, the argument is also said to be valid. All arguments are valid or invalid, and valid or not; there's no middle point, like there's some relevance.
To learn more about deductively valid argument from given link
brainly.com/question/14585049
#SPJ4
