The answer is functional.
Functional groups in working context, means a group of people that are categorized by their work function – or more specifically the specialized work field that they are responsible for.
This is apparent in the example, with classifications such as accounting department and customer service department. Other examples would be marketing department and research & development department.
Answer:
a. Transaction 1
It is not deductible so the Taxable income is $9,000
Transaction 2
It is deductible, taxable income would be;
= 13,500 * ( 1 - Tax)
= 13,500 * ( 1 - 20%)
= $10,800
b. Transaction 1
It is not deductible so the Taxable income is $9,000
Transaction 2
It is deductible, taxable income would be;
= 13,500 * ( 1 - Tax)
= 13,500 * ( 1 - 40%)
= $8,100
Not sure what the choices are, but traditional management is where goals and objectives are created at the top and employees are in charge of meeting them and for the quality of the product. This is opposed to a quality - focused management style which is more collaborative with customers to achieve continuous improvement of your product and/or service.
Answer: Start = $300 million
End = $318.59 million
Explanation:
NAV can be calculated by dividing the funds Assets net of Liabilities by the total number of outstanding shares.
At start of the year NAV is $300 million and NAV per share is therefore,
= 300 million/ 10 million
= $30 per share.
Ending NAV
During the year the fund made Investments and increased by a price of 7%
= 300 million (1 + 0.07)
= $321 million
We still have to subtract the 12b-1 fees that the fund charges though and that would result in,
= 321 million * (1 - 0.0075)
= 318.5925
= $318.59 million.
Dividing this by the total number of outstanding shares we have,
= 318.59 /10
= $31.86
$31.86 is the NAV per share at year end.
Answer:
The correct adjusting journal entry for 12/31/09:
D. debit Spice Expense and credit Spice Inventory 240
Explanation:
Roland Richard purchased 200 ounces off of an expensive spice for $400.
Cost per ounce = $400/200 = $2
By December, 12/31/09, there were 80 ounces on hand. Roland Richard used 120 ounces of expensive spice with the amount of expense: $2 x 120 = $240
The adjusting journal entry for 12/31/09:
Debit Spice Expense $240
Credit Spice Inventory $240
