Answer:
The greatest common factor of this would be 3x^2y
Step-by-step explanation:
In order to find this, first find the greatest common factor of the coefficients. Since 3 goes in evenly to both 15 and -18, then we know that it is a common factor.
From there we need to find the number of x's. Since the first term only has 2 x's and the second has 3, we take the lowest number. (x^2)
And since the first term has 3 y's and the second has just 1, we take the lowest number (y).
Help help help help help help
It's not an irrational number because the decimal is repeating. If it went on forever and never repeated then it would be an irrational number.
I think the error is that Richie thought for a number to be irrational, it just needed to repeat forever.
Answer:
Following are the response to the given points:
Step-by-step explanation:
For question 5.11:
For point a:
For all the particular circumstances, it was not an appropriate sampling strategy as each normal distribution acquired is at a minimum of 30(5) = 150 or 2.5 hours for a time. Its point is not absolutely fair if it exhibits any spike change for roughly 10 minutes.
For point b:
The problem would be that the process can transition to an in the state in less than half an hour and return to in the state. Thus, each subgroup is a biased selection of the whole element created over the last hours. Another sampling approach is a group.
For question 5.12:
This production method creates 500 pieces each day. A sampling section is selected every half an hour, and the average of five dimensions can be seen in a line graph when 5 parts were achieved.
This is not an appropriate sampling method if the assigned reason leads to a sluggish, prolonged uplift. The difficulty would be that gradual or longer upward drift in the procedure takes or less half an hour then returns to a controlled state. Suppose that a shift of both the detectable size will last hours . An alternative type of analysis should be a random sample of five consecutive pieces created every hour.